Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B comes out ahead, 59 to 46 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Moonshot AIKimi K3.1 Pro
46/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $10.00
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.50
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B is our pick
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Kimi K3.1 Pro (46). It leads on price. Kimi K3.1 Pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B $0.275 · Kimi K3.1 Pro $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameKimi K3.1 Pro 1,048,576 · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsKimi K3.1 ProKimi K3.1 Pro: Text, Images, Video · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B: Text
- Self-hostingNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 20 | 73 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 46/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI | Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.20 (best) |
| Output | $10.00 | $0.50 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.20 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.00 | $0.275 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Moonshot AI API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · high · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | kimi-k3.1-pro | — |
| API providers | 17 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro$40.00
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Kimi K3.1 Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Kimi K3.1 Pro (46). It leads on price. Kimi K3.1 Pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.275 per million tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B versus $4.00 for Kimi K3.1 Pro (15× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Kimi K3.1 Pro has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K3.1 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Kimi K3.1 Pro up to 131,072, Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Kimi K3.1 Pro accepts text, images and video; Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B accepts text. Kimi K3.1 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Kimi K3.1 Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Kimi K3.1 Pro is the newest, released Oct 23, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B came out Oct 15, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add ParetoThree-way comparison
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ParetoUnbiased
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Fugu MaxSakana AI
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3.8 Max PrimeAlibaba (Qwen)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMax
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Kolibri 1Aleph Alpha
