Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 comes out ahead, 50 to 38 on our weighted score, though Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 is 10% cheaper per token.
Moonshot AIKimi K2 Instruct 0905
38/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.50
- Context262K
- Our pickMoonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
50/100- ECI148.1
- Price$0.60 / $3.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Kimi K2.5 is our pick
Kimi K2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (38). It leads on inputs & features. Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceKimi K2 Instruct 0905Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 $1.07 · Kimi K2.5 $1.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameKimi K2 Instruct 0905 262,144 · Kimi K2.5 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsKimi K2.5Kimi K2 Instruct 0905: Text · Kimi K2.5: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 46 | 44 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 38/100 | 50/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Kimi K2 Instruct 0905Moonshot AI | Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 148.1 |
| ECI rank | — | #68 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 87.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 92.2% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 73.8% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 34.3% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.50 (best) | $3.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.07 (best) | $1.20 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 12 providers | Median of 33 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 98,304 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenModified MIT | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 13 | 33 (best) |
| Released | Sep 5, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905$11.00
- Kimi K2.5$12.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 or Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (38). It leads on inputs & features. Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 or Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 is cheaper at $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 33 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.07 per million tokens for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 versus $1.20 for Kimi K2.5 (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has not been scored yet and Kimi K2.5 has an ECI of 148.1.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 and Kimi K2.5 share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 up to 98,304, Kimi K2.5 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 accepts text; Kimi K2.5 accepts text, images and video. Kimi K2.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Modified MIT), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Kimi K2.5 is the newest, released Jan 27, 2026. Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 came out Sep 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.5 Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Apertus 70BThree-way comparison
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs Apertus 70BSwiss AI
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs GLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu)
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs Ling-1TinclusionAI
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs Relace Apply 3Relace
- Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 147.8
- Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · ECI 148.8
