ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Kimi K2.6 vs Inkling vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) comes out ahead, 67 to 64 and 63 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.6

    Released Apr 20, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI151.1
    • Price$0.95 / $4.00
    • Context262K
  2. Thinking Machines

    Inkling

    Released Jul 15, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI148.5
    • Price$1.00 / $4.05
    • Context1.05M
  3. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI152.3
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is our pick

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Kimi K2.6 (64) and Inkling (63). It leads on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 · Kimi K2.6 151.1 · Inkling 148.5
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) $1.56 · Kimi K2.6 $1.71 · Inkling $1.76 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInklingInkling 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Kimi K2.6 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsKimi K2.6: Text, Images, Video · Inkling: Text, Images, Audio · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.6 and InklingPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightKimi K2.6InklingGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%787579
Price25%373739
Inputs & features15%807080
Context window10%376160
Overall100%64/10063/10067/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Kimi K2.6 vs Inkling vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) specifications side by side
SpecificationKimi K2.6Moonshot AIInklingThinking MachinesGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)151.1148.5152.3 (best)
ECI rank#55 of 165#67 of 165#51 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions90.8% (best)88.3%89.3%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics57.2% (best)33.3%44.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics96.1% (best)88.9%92.2%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues76.7%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions34.9%40.3% (best)30.2%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.95 (best)$1.00$1.25
Output$4.00$4.05$2.50 (best)
Cached input$0.16 (best)$0.17$0.20
Blended (3:1)$1.71$1.76$1.56 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00
Price sourceOfficial Moonshot AI APIOfficial Thinking Machines APIOfficial xAI API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)30,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoYesNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache-2.0Proprietary
API model IDkimi-k2.6thinkingmachines/Inkling:peft:262144:sampling-nvfp4grok-4.20-0309-reasoning
API providers60 (best)2015
ReleasedApr 20, 2026Jul 15, 2026Mar 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Kimi K2.6$17.50
  • Inkling$18.10
  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)$17.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Kimi K2.6, Inkling or Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Kimi K2.6 (64) and Inkling (63). It leads on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6, Inkling or Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price); Inkling costs $1.00 input / $4.05 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) versus $1.71 for Kimi K2.6 (1.1× as much) and $1.76 for Inkling (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 (#51 of 165), Kimi K2.6 151.1 (#55 of 165) and Inkling 148.5 (#67 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (149.5–154.7 vs 149.1–152.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Kimi K2.6 90.8%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 89.3%, Inkling 88.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Kimi K2.6 57.2%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 44.9%, Inkling 33.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Kimi K2.6 96.1%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 92.2%, Inkling 88.9%; SimpleQA Verified — Inkling 40.3%, Kimi K2.6 34.9%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 30.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Inkling and Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and 262,144 for Kimi K2.6. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2.6 up to 262,144, Inkling up to 1,048,576, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) up to 30,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Kimi K2.6 accepts text, images and video; Inkling accepts text, images and audio; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.6 and Inkling publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Inkling is the newest, released Jul 15, 2026. Kimi K2.6 came out Apr 20, 2026; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.6 Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.