Jamba Mini vs Seed 2.0 Lite vs Solar Pro 3
Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 57 and 55 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
AI21 LabsJamba Mini
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.40
- Context256K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
Upstage
Solar Pro 3
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context131K
Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Jamba Mini (57) and Solar Pro 3 (55). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite $0.20 · Jamba Mini $0.25 · Solar Pro 3 $0.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextJamba Mini and Seed 2.0 LiteJamba Mini 256,000 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Solar Pro 3 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteJamba Mini: Text · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Solar Pro 3: Text
- Self-hostingJamba MiniPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Jamba Mini | Seed 2.0 Lite | Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 78 | 83 | 78 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 36 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 73/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Jamba MiniAI21 Labs | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | Solar Pro 3Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.089 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.40 | $0.534 | $0.25 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.018 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.25 | $0.20 (best) | $0.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official AI21 Labs API | Official Volcengine Ark API | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 32,000 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | jamba-mini | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 | solar-pro3 |
| API providers | 1 | 6 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Jan 1, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 | Jan 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 22, 2024 | — | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Jamba Mini$2.80
- Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
- Solar Pro 3$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Jamba Mini, Seed 2.0 Lite or Solar Pro 3?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Jamba Mini (57) and Solar Pro 3 (55). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Jamba Mini, Seed 2.0 Lite or Solar Pro 3?
Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper at $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Jamba Mini costs $0.20 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price); Solar Pro 3 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Lite versus $0.25 for Jamba Mini (1.2× as much) and $0.25 for Solar Pro 3 (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Jamba Mini has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 3 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Jamba Mini, Seed 2.0 Lite and Solar Pro 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Jamba Mini and Seed 2.0 Lite have the largest context windows (256,000 and 256,000 tokens), against 131,072 for Solar Pro 3. Maximum output per response: Jamba Mini up to 4,096, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000, Solar Pro 3 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Jamba Mini accepts text; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Solar Pro 3 accepts text. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Jamba Mini publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite and Solar Pro 3 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Jamba Mini came out Jan 1, 2026; Solar Pro 3 came out Jan 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Jamba Mini Aug 22, 2024, Solar Pro 3 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
