Jamba Large vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 comes out ahead, 55 to 29 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
AI21 LabsJamba Large
29/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $8.00
- Context256K
- Our pick
Mistral AIVoxtral Small 24B 2507
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context33K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is our pick
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Jamba Large (29). It leads on price and inputs & features. Jamba Large wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 · Jamba Large $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextJamba LargeJamba Large 256,000 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Jamba Large: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Jamba Large | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 23 | 82 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 29/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Jamba LargeAI21 Labs | Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $8.00 | $0.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.50 | $0.175 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official AI21 Labs API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | jamba-large | voxtral-small-latest |
| API providers | 1 | 10 (best) |
| Released | Jul 3, 2025 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 22, 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Jamba Large$36.00
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Jamba Large or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Jamba Large (29). It leads on price and inputs & features. Jamba Large wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Jamba Large or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Jamba Large costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus $3.50 for Jamba Large (20× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Jamba Large has not been scored yet and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Jamba Large and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Jamba Large has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Jamba Large up to 4,096, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Jamba Large accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the newest, released Jul 15, 2025. Jamba Large came out Jul 3, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Jamba Large Aug 22, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen MT PlusThree-way comparison
- Jamba Large vs Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
- Jamba Large vs o4-mini-deep-researchOpenAI
- Jamba Large vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
- Jamba Large vs Command A VisionCohere
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Qwen FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
