Jamba Large vs Qwen MT Plus vs Qwen3 Max Preview
Qwen3 Max Preview comes out ahead, 33 to 29 and 11 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
AI21 LabsJamba Large
29/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $8.00
- Context256K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen MT Plus
11/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
- Our pickAlibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 Max Preview
33/100- ECI—
- Price$0.975 / $4.14
- Context262K
Qwen3 Max Preview is our pick
Qwen3 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Jamba Large (29) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on price. Jamba Large wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 Max PreviewQwen3 Max Preview $1.77 · Jamba Large $3.50 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 Max PreviewQwen3 Max Preview 262,144 · Jamba Large 256,000 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsJamba Large: Text · Qwen MT Plus: Text · Qwen3 Max Preview: Text
- Self-hostingJamba LargePublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Jamba Large | Qwen MT Plus | Qwen3 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 23 | 22 | 37 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 0 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 0 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 29/100 | 11/100 | 33/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Jamba LargeAI21 Labs | Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.46 | $0.975 (best) |
| Output | $8.00 | $7.37 | $4.14 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.50 | $3.69 | $1.77 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official AI21 Labs API | Official Alibaba API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | jamba-large | qwen-mt-plus | — |
| API providers | 1 | 3 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Jul 3, 2025 | Jul 24, 2025 | Sep 5, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 22, 2024 | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Jamba Large$36.00
- Qwen MT Plus$39.34
- Qwen3 Max Preview$18.03
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Jamba Large, Qwen MT Plus or Qwen3 Max Preview?
Qwen3 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Jamba Large (29) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on price. Jamba Large wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Jamba Large, Qwen MT Plus or Qwen3 Max Preview?
Qwen3 Max Preview is cheaper at $0.975 input / $4.14 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Jamba Large costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price); Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.77 per million tokens for Qwen3 Max Preview versus $3.50 for Jamba Large (2× as much) and $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (2.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Jamba Large has not been scored yet, Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet and Qwen3 Max Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Jamba Large, Qwen MT Plus and Qwen3 Max Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Max Preview has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Jamba Large and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: Jamba Large up to 4,096, Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192, Qwen3 Max Preview up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Jamba Large accepts text; Qwen MT Plus accepts text; Qwen3 Max Preview accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Jamba Large publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen MT Plus and Qwen3 Max Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 Max Preview is the newest, released Sep 5, 2025. Qwen MT Plus came out Jul 24, 2025; Jamba Large came out Jul 3, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Jamba Large Aug 22, 2024, Qwen3 Max Preview Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
