ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Jamba Large vs Morph V3 Fast vs Qwen MT Plus

Too close to call on our weighted score (Morph V3 Fast 32, Jamba Large 29, Qwen MT Plus 11). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. AI21 Labs

    Jamba Large

    Released Jul 3, 2025

    29/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context256K
  2. Morph

    Morph V3 Fast

    Released Jul 7, 2025

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $1.20
    • Context262K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen MT Plus

    Released Jul 24, 2025

    11/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.46 / $7.37
    • Context16K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Morph V3 Fast 32/100, Jamba Large 29/100, Qwen MT Plus 11/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Morph V3 Fast on price and Morph V3 Fast for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast $0.90 · Jamba Large $3.50 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast 262,144 · Jamba Large 256,000 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsJamba Large: Text · Morph V3 Fast: Text · Qwen MT Plus: Text
  • Self-hostingJamba LargePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightJamba LargeMorph V3 FastQwen MT Plus
Price50%235022
Inputs & features30%3500
Context window20%36370
Overall100%29/10032/10011/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Jamba Large vs Morph V3 Fast vs Qwen MT Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationJamba LargeAI21 LabsMorph V3 FastMorphQwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.80 (best)$2.46
Output$8.00$1.20 (best)$7.37
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.50$0.90 (best)$3.69
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial AI21 Labs APIMedian of 5 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesNoNo
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model IDjamba-large—qwen-mt-plus
API providers15 (best)3
ReleasedJul 3, 2025Jul 7, 2025Jul 24, 2025
Knowledge cutoffAug 22, 2024——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Jamba Large$36.00
  • Morph V3 Fast$10.40
  • Qwen MT Plus$39.34
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Jamba Large, Morph V3 Fast or Qwen MT Plus?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Morph V3 Fast 32/100, Jamba Large 29/100, Qwen MT Plus 11/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Morph V3 Fast on price and Morph V3 Fast for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Jamba Large, Morph V3 Fast or Qwen MT Plus?

Morph V3 Fast is cheaper at $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Jamba Large costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price); Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Morph V3 Fast versus $3.50 for Jamba Large (3.9× as much) and $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (4.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Jamba Large has not been scored yet, Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet and Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Jamba Large, Morph V3 Fast and Qwen MT Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast and Qwen MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Morph V3 Fast has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Jamba Large and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: Jamba Large up to 4,096, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Jamba Large accepts text; Morph V3 Fast accepts text; Qwen MT Plus accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Jamba Large publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Morph V3 Fast and Qwen MT Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen MT Plus is the newest, released Jul 24, 2025. Morph V3 Fast came out Jul 7, 2025; Jamba Large came out Jul 3, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Jamba Large Aug 22, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.