ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Inkling Small vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 70, Qwen3.7 Plus 70). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI150.2
    • Price$0.50 / $1.20
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Inkling Small

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.7 Plus

    Released Jun 2, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI147.4
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.7 Plus

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityInkling SmallCapabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 · Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.675 · Qwen3.7 Plus $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInkling SmallInkling Small 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Plus 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsInkling Small: Text, Images, Audio · Qwen3.7 Plus: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingInkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightInkling SmallQwen3.7 Plus
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%7875
Price25%5857
Inputs & features15%7080
Context window10%6160
Overall100%70/10070/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Inkling Small vs Qwen3.7 Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationInkling SmallThinking MachinesQwen3.7 PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)150.2 (best)147.4
ECI rank#47 of 148 (best)#61 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions88.5% (best)87.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics46.3% (best)34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics90.0%93.3% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions19.1%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.40 (best)
Output$1.20 (best)$1.60
Cached input—$0.04
Blended (3:1)$0.675 (best)$0.70
Long-context rateSame rateOver 256K: $1.20 / $4.80
Price sourceMedian of 11 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output1,048,576 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioYesNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0Proprietary
API model ID—qwen3.7-plus
API providers1125 (best)
ReleasedJul 30, 2026Jun 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Inkling Small$7.40
  • Qwen3.7 Plus$7.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Inkling Small or Qwen3.7 Plus?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Inkling Small or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.675 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $0.70 for Qwen3.7 Plus (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Inkling Small scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 (#47 of 148) and Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4 (#61 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (147.5–152.1 vs 145.7–148.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Inkling Small 88.5%, Qwen3.7 Plus 87.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Inkling Small 46.3%, Qwen3.7 Plus 34.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.7 Plus 93.3%, Inkling Small 90.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Inkling Small and Qwen3.7 Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Inkling Small leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling Small has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Maximum output per response: Inkling Small up to 1,048,576, Qwen3.7 Plus up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio; Qwen3.7 Plus accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.7 Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Inkling Small is the newest, released Jul 30, 2026. Qwen3.7 Plus came out Jun 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3.7 Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons