ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Inkling Small vs Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 27B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 70, Qwen3.7 Plus 70, Qwen3.8 27B 67). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI150.2
    • Price$0.50 / $1.20
    • Context1.05M
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.7 Plus

    Released Jun 2, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI147.4
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1M
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 27B

    Released Aug 14, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI149.4
    • Price$0.40 / $2.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100, Qwen3.8 27B 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityInkling SmallCapabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 · Qwen3.8 27B 149.4 · Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.675 · Qwen3.7 Plus $0.70 · Qwen3.8 27B $0.925 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInkling SmallInkling Small 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Plus 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 27B 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsInkling Small: Text, Images, Audio · Qwen3.7 Plus: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.8 27B: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingInkling Small and Qwen3.8 27BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightInkling SmallQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 27B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%787577
Price25%585751
Inputs & features15%708080
Context window10%616037
Overall100%70/10070/10067/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Inkling Small vs Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 27B specifications side by side
SpecificationInkling SmallThinking MachinesQwen3.7 PlusAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)150.2 (best)147.4149.4
ECI rank#47 of 148 (best)#61 of 148#53 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions88.5% (best)87.9%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics46.3% (best)34.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics90.0%93.3% (best)—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions19.1%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.40 (best)$0.40 (best)
Output$1.20 (best)$1.60$2.50
Cached input—$0.04—
Blended (3:1)$0.675 (best)$0.70$0.925
Long-context rateSame rateOver 256K: $1.20 / $4.80Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 11 providersOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 39 providers
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output1,048,576 tokens (best)64,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0ProprietaryOpen
API model ID—qwen3.7-plus—
API providers112541 (best)
ReleasedJul 30, 2026Jun 2, 2026Aug 14, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Inkling Small$7.40
  • Qwen3.7 Plus$7.20
  • Qwen3.8 27B$9.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Inkling Small, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 27B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100, Qwen3.8 27B 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Inkling Small, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 27B?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.40 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 39 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.675 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $0.70 for Qwen3.7 Plus (1× as much) and $0.925 for Qwen3.8 27B (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Inkling Small scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 (#47 of 148), Qwen3.8 27B 149.4 (#53 of 148) and Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4 (#61 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (147.5–152.1 vs 147.5–151.6), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Inkling Small, Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Inkling Small leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling Small has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Plus and 262,144 for Qwen3.8 27B. Maximum output per response: Inkling Small up to 1,048,576, Qwen3.7 Plus up to 64,000, Qwen3.8 27B up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio; Qwen3.7 Plus accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.8 27B accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling Small and Qwen3.8 27B publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.7 Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.8 27B is the newest, released Aug 14, 2026. Inkling Small came out Jul 30, 2026; Qwen3.7 Plus came out Jun 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3.7 Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.