Inkling Small vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B
Gemini 3.6 Flash comes out ahead, 72 to 68 and 66 on our weighted score, though Inkling Small is 47% cheaper per token.
Thinking MachinesInkling Small
68/100- ECI150.5
- Price$0.58 / $1.44
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3.6 Flash
72/100- ECI154.7
- Price$0.75 / $3.75
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 27B
66/100- ECI151.8
- Price$0.40 / $2.55
- Context262K
Gemini 3.6 Flash is our pick
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Inkling Small (68) and Qwen3.8 27B (66). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Inkling Small wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 3.6 FlashCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.7 · Qwen3.8 27B 151.8 · Inkling Small 150.5
- Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.795 · Qwen3.8 27B $0.938 · Gemini 3.6 Flash $1.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextInkling Small and Gemini 3.6 FlashInkling Small 1,048,576 · Gemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576 · Qwen3.8 27B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.6 FlashInkling Small: Text, Images, Audio · Gemini 3.6 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen3.8 27B: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingInkling Small and Qwen3.8 27BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Inkling Small | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 77 | 82 | 79 |
| Price | 25% | 52 | 40 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 100 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 72/100 | 66/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Inkling SmallThinking Machines | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle | Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 150.5 | 154.7 (best) | 151.8 |
| ECI rank | #58 of 165 | #42 of 165 (best) | #54 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 88.5% | 94.1% (best) | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 46.3% | 59.0% (best) | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 90.0% | 94.2% (best) | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 19.1% | 66.2% (best) | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.58 | $0.75 | $0.40 (best) |
| Output | $1.44 (best) | $3.75 | $2.55 |
| Cached input | $0.116 | $0.075 (best) | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.795 (best) | $1.50 | $0.938 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Thinking Machines API | Official Google API | Median of 49 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenApache-2.0 | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small | gemini-3.6-flash | — |
| API providers | 12 | 31 | 53 (best) |
| Released | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 21, 2026 | Aug 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Mar 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Inkling Small$8.68
- Gemini 3.6 Flash$15.00
- Qwen3.8 27B$9.10
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Inkling Small, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Inkling Small (68) and Qwen3.8 27B (66). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Inkling Small wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Inkling Small, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?
Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.58 input / $1.44 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.40 input / $2.55 output per million tokens (median across 49 API providers); Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.795 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $0.938 for Qwen3.8 27B (1.2× as much) and $1.50 for Gemini 3.6 Flash (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.7 (#42 of 165), Qwen3.8 27B 151.8 (#54 of 165) and Inkling Small 150.5 (#58 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (153.0–156.7 vs 149.9–153.6), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Inkling Small, Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3.6 Flash leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Inkling Small and Gemini 3.6 Flash have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 262,144 for Qwen3.8 27B. Maximum output per response: Inkling Small up to 1,048,576, Gemini 3.6 Flash up to 65,536, Qwen3.8 27B up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio; Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen3.8 27B accepts text, images and video. Gemini 3.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Inkling Small and Qwen3.8 27B publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.6 Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 27B is the newest, released Aug 14, 2026. Inkling Small came out Jul 30, 2026; Gemini 3.6 Flash came out Jul 21, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.6 Flash Mar 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Inkling Small vs Mistral Large 4Mistral AI · ECI 150.6
- Inkling Small vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.2
- Inkling Small vs Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle · ECI 145.0
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1Meta · ECI 154.2
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek · ECI 155.9
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 156.2
