Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
Gemma 4 12B IT comes out ahead, 70 to 66 and 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
TencentHy-MT2-30B-A3B
44/100- ECI—
- Price$0.074 / $0.295
- Context8K
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
66/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context262K
- Our pick
GoogleGemma 4 12B IT
70/100- ECI—
- Price$0.075 / $0.275
- Context262K
Gemma 4 12B IT is our pick
Gemma 4 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (66) and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B (44). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemma 4 12B ITGemma 4 12B IT $0.125 · Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.129 · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextOrnith 1.5 35B A3B and Gemma 4 12B ITOrnith 1.5 35B A3B 262,144 · Gemma 4 12B IT 262,144 · Hy-MT2-30B-A3B 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsOrnith 1.5 35B A3B and Gemma 4 12B ITHy-MT2-30B-A3B: Text · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B: Text, Images · Gemma 4 12B IT: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Ornith 1.5 35B A3B | Gemma 4 12B IT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 88 | 82 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 60 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 44/100 | 66/100 | 70/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Hy-MT2-30B-A3BTencent | Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce | Gemma 4 12B ITGoogle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.074 (best) | $0.10 | $0.075 |
| Output | $0.295 | $0.40 | $0.275 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.129 | $0.175 | $0.125 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,192 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | — | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenMIT | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 3 (best) | 1 | 2 |
| Released | May 21, 2026 | Aug 18, 2026 | Jun 9, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$1.33
- Ornith 1.5 35B A3B$1.80
- Gemma 4 12B IT$1.30
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B or Gemma 4 12B IT?
Gemma 4 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (66) and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B (44). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B or Gemma 4 12B IT?
Gemma 4 12B IT is cheaper at $0.075 input / $0.275 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs $0.074 input / $0.295 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Ornith 1.5 35B A3B costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Gemma 4 12B IT versus $0.129 for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B (1× as much) and $0.175 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has not been scored yet, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B has not been scored yet and Gemma 4 12B IT has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B and Gemma 4 12B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Hy-MT2-30B-A3B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B and Gemma 4 12B IT have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 8,192 for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B. Maximum output per response: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B up to 4,096, Gemma 4 12B IT up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B accepts text; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B accepts text and images; Gemma 4 12B IT accepts text and images. Ornith 1.5 35B A3B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (MIT), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is the newest, released Aug 18, 2026. Gemma 4 12B IT came out Jun 9, 2026; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B came out May 21, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
