Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B
Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B comes out ahead, 51 to 32 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Nous ResearchHermes 3 70B Instruct
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.70 / $0.70
- Context131K
- Our pickNous Research
Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.14 / $0.14
- Context8K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is our pick
Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Hermes 3 70B Instruct (32). It leads on price and inputs & features. Hermes 3 70B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B $0.14 · Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextHermes 3 70B InstructHermes 3 70B Instruct 131,072 · Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsHermes 3 70B Instruct: Text · Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 55 | 87 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 32/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research | Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BNous Research |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.70 | $0.14 (best) |
| Output | $0.70 | $0.14 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.70 | $0.14 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 5 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenLlama 3 Community License |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 5 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Aug 18, 2024 | Apr 30, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 31, 2023 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct$8.40
- Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B$1.68
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B?
Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Hermes 3 70B Instruct (32). It leads on price and inputs & features. Hermes 3 70B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B?
Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.14 per million tokens for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B versus $0.70 for Hermes 3 70B Instruct (5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Hermes 3 70B Instruct has not been scored yet and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Hermes 3 70B Instruct does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hermes 3 70B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 8,192 for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B. Maximum output per response: Hermes 3 70B Instruct up to 16,384, Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Hermes 3 70B Instruct accepts text; Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Llama 3 Community License), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Hermes 3 70B Instruct is the newest, released Aug 18, 2024. Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B came out Apr 30, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Hermes 3 70B Instruct Dec 31, 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Aya Expanse 32BThree-way comparison
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Aya Expanse 32BCohere
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs CodestralMistral AI
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Aion-RP 1.0 (8B)Aion Labs
- Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B vs solar-miniUpstage
- Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta
