ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B vs Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs solar-mini

Too close to call on our weighted score (Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B 51, solar-mini 50, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Nous Research

    Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B

    Released Apr 30, 2024

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.14
    • Context8K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2 Instruct 0905

    Released Sep 5, 2025

    38/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.50
    • Context262K
  3. Upstage

    solar-mini

    Released Jun 12, 2024

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B 51/100, solar-mini 50/100, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B on price and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B $0.14 · solar-mini $0.15 · Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 $1.07 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextKimi K2 Instruct 0905Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 262,144 · solar-mini 32,768 · Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B: Text · Kimi K2 Instruct 0905: Text · solar-mini: Text
  • Self-hostingHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905Publishes downloadable weights (Llama 3 Community License and Modified MIT)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BKimi K2 Instruct 0905solar-mini
Price50%874685
Inputs & features30%252525
Context window20%0370
Overall100%51/10038/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B vs Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs solar-mini specifications side by side
SpecificationHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BNous ResearchKimi K2 Instruct 0905Moonshot AIsolar-miniUpstage
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.14 (best)$0.60$0.15
Output$0.14 (best)$2.50$0.15
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.14 (best)$1.07$0.15
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersMedian of 12 providersOfficial Upstage API
Limits
Context window8,192 tokens262,144 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens98,304 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenLlama 3 Community LicenseOpenModified MITProprietary
API model ID——solar-mini
API providers213 (best)1
ReleasedApr 30, 2024Sep 5, 2025Jun 12, 2024
Knowledge cutoff——Sep 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B$1.68
  • Kimi K2 Instruct 0905$11.00
  • solar-mini$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 or solar-mini?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B 51/100, solar-mini 50/100, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B on price and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 or solar-mini?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). solar-mini costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price); Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 costs $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.14 per million tokens for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B versus $0.15 for solar-mini (1.1× as much) and $1.07 for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (7.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B has not been scored yet, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has not been scored yet and solar-mini has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 and solar-mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 32,768 for solar-mini and 8,192 for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B. Maximum output per response: Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B up to 8,192, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 up to 98,304, solar-mini up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B accepts text; Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 accepts text; solar-mini accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 publishes its weights (Llama 3 Community License and Modified MIT) and can be self-hosted; solar-mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 is the newest, released Sep 5, 2025. solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024; Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B came out Apr 30, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: solar-mini Sep 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.