Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs GLM-4.7
Too close to call on our weighted score (Claude Haiku 4.5 47, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT 45, GLM-4.7 41). The right pick depends on what you value most.
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
47/100- ECI142.2
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context200K
AI Singapore
Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.351 / $0.555
- Context128K
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.7
41/100- ECI143.7
- Price$0.60 / $2.20
- Context205K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Claude Haiku 4.5 47/100, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT 45/100, GLM-4.7 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT on price and GLM-4.7 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT $0.402 · GLM-4.7 $1.00 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGLM-4.7GLM-4.7 204,800 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 · Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT: Text, Images · GLM-4.7: Text
- Self-hostingGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT and GLM-4.7Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 34 | 66 | 48 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 24 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 45/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITAI Singapore | GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 142.2 | — | 143.7 (best) |
| ECI rank | #102 of 165 | — | #94 of 165 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 71.2% | — | 83.3% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 66.7% | — | 83.3% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 13.2% | — | 32.2% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.351 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $5.00 | $0.555 (best) | $2.20 |
| Cached input | $0.10 (best) | — | $0.11 |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.402 (best) | $1.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Median of 3 providers | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 204,800 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | claude-haiku-4-5 | — | glm-4.7 |
| API providers | 48 (best) | 3 | 31 |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 28, 2025 | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
- Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT$4.62
- GLM-4.7$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT or GLM-4.7?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Claude Haiku 4.5 47/100, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT 45/100, GLM-4.7 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT on price and GLM-4.7 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT or GLM-4.7?
Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT is cheaper at $0.351 input / $0.555 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.402 per million tokens for Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT versus $1.00 for GLM-4.7 (2.5× as much) and $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Claude Haiku 4.5 has an ECI of 142.2, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT has not been scored yet and GLM-4.7 has an ECI of 143.7.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT and GLM-4.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-4.7 has the largest context window at 204,800 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 128,000 for Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT up to 128,000, GLM-4.7 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT accepts text and images; GLM-4.7 accepts text. Claude Haiku 4.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT and GLM-4.7 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.7 is the newest, released Dec 22, 2025. Claude Haiku 4.5 came out Oct 15, 2025; Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025, GLM-4.7 Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI · ECI 141.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba (Qwen) · ECI 143.8
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI · ECI 145.9
- Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen)
- Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5NVIDIA
- Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
