Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Gemma 3 4B IT
Gemma 3 4B IT comes out ahead, 52 to 46 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
AnthropicClaude Haiku 3.5
46/100- ECI127.0
- Price$0.80 / $4.00
- Context200K
- Our pick
GoogleGemma 3 4B IT
52/100- ECI115.8
- Price$0.05 / $0.10
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemma 3 4B IT is our pick
Gemma 3 4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Claude Haiku 3.5 (46). It leads on price. Claude Haiku 3.5 wins on capability, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Haiku 3.5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Haiku 3.5 127.0 · Gemma 3 4B IT 115.8
- Lowest priceGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT $0.063 · Claude Haiku 3.5 $1.60 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextClaude Haiku 3.5Claude Haiku 3.5 200,000 · Gemma 3 4B IT 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 3.5Claude Haiku 3.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemma 3 4B IT: Text, Images
- Self-hostingGemma 3 4B ITPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Haiku 3.5 | Gemma 3 4B IT |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 48 | 34 |
| Price | 25% | 38 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 60 | 50 |
| Context window | 10% | 32 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 46/100 | 52/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Haiku 3.5Anthropic | Gemma 3 4B ITGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 127.0 (best) | 115.8 |
| ECI rank | #147 of 165 (best) | #163 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 38.1% (best) | 23.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 4.3% | 7.5% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.80 | $0.05 (best) |
| Output | $4.00 | $0.10 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.60 | $0.063 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 9 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 4 | 10 (best) |
| Released | Oct 22, 2024 | Mar 12, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jul 31, 2024 | Aug 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Haiku 3.5$16.00
- Gemma 3 4B IT$0.70
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Haiku 3.5 or Gemma 3 4B IT?
Gemma 3 4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Claude Haiku 3.5 (46). It leads on price. Claude Haiku 3.5 wins on capability, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 3.5 or Gemma 3 4B IT?
Gemma 3 4B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). Claude Haiku 3.5 costs $0.80 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Gemma 3 4B IT versus $1.60 for Claude Haiku 3.5 (26× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Haiku 3.5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Haiku 3.5 127.0 (#147 of 165) and Gemma 3 4B IT 115.8 (#163 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (121.4–129.2 vs 97.9–123.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Claude Haiku 3.5 38.1%, Gemma 3 4B IT 23.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemma 3 4B IT 7.5%, Claude Haiku 3.5 4.3%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 3.5 and Gemma 3 4B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Haiku 3.5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 3.5 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 3 4B IT. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 3.5 up to 8,192, Gemma 3 4B IT up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Haiku 3.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemma 3 4B IT accepts text and images. Claude Haiku 3.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma 3 4B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 3.5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemma 3 4B IT is the newest, released Mar 12, 2025. Claude Haiku 3.5 came out Oct 22, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 3.5 Jul 31, 2024, Gemma 3 4B IT Aug 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Mistral Large 2.1Three-way comparison
- Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Mistral Large 2.1Mistral AI · ECI 128.6
- Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Llama-3.3-70B-InstructMeta · ECI 127.3
- Claude Haiku 3.5 vs GPT-4oOpenAI · ECI 129.0
- Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Gemma 2 27BGoogle · ECI 122.1
- Gemma 3 4B IT vs Llama-3.2-1BMeta
- Gemma 3 4B IT vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
