Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 48 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
xAIGrok Code Fast 1
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.50
- Context256K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is our pick
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Grok Code Fast 1 (48). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct $0.263 · Grok Code Fast 1 $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct 262,144 · Grok Code Fast 1 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructGrok Code Fast 1: Text · Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Grok Code Fast 1 | Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 60 | 74 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok Code Fast 1xAI | Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $1.50 | $0.60 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.525 | $0.263 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 5 providers | Median of 13 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 10,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 7 | 13 (best) |
| Released | Sep 2, 2025 | Oct 4, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok Code Fast 1$5.00
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$2.70
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok Code Fast 1 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Grok Code Fast 1 (48). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (median across 13 API providers). Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct versus $0.525 for Grok Code Fast 1 (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Grok Code Fast 1 has not been scored yet and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1. Maximum output per response: Grok Code Fast 1 up to 10,000, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok Code Fast 1 accepts text; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct accepts text, images and video. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Grok Code Fast 1 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is the newest, released Oct 4, 2025. Grok Code Fast 1 came out Sep 2, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3-VL PlusThree-way comparison
- Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
- Grok Code Fast 1 vs Codestral 25.08Mistral AI
- Grok Code Fast 1 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BBaidu
- Grok Code Fast 1 vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Grok 4.1 FastxAI
- Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VLNVIDIA
