ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3-VL Plus

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking 59, Qwen3-VL Plus 58, Grok Code Fast 1 48). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. xAI

    Grok Code Fast 1

    Released Sep 2, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.50
    • Context256K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking

    Released Sep 22, 2025

    59/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.97
    • Context66K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL Plus

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.60
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking 59/100, Qwen3-VL Plus 58/100, Grok Code Fast 1 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking on price and Qwen3-VL Plus for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingQwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking $0.43 · Grok Code Fast 1 $0.525 · Qwen3-VL Plus $0.55 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-VL PlusQwen3-VL Plus 262,144 · Grok Code Fast 1 256,000 · Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1: Text · Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Qwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingQwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingQwen3-VL Plus
Price50%606460
Inputs & features30%358070
Context window20%361237
Overall100%48/10059/10058/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3-VL Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok Code Fast 1xAIQwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20 (best)$0.25$0.20 (best)
Output$1.50$0.97 (best)$1.60
Cached input——$0.04
Blended (3:1)$0.525$0.43 (best)$0.55
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 32K: $0.30 / $2.40
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersMedian of 1 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens65,536 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output10,000 tokens16,384 tokens32,768 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0Proprietary
API model ID——qwen3-vl-plus
API providers7 (best)16
ReleasedSep 2, 2025Sep 22, 2025Sep 23, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok Code Fast 1$5.00
  • Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking$4.44
  • Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok Code Fast 1, Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking or Qwen3-VL Plus?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking 59/100, Qwen3-VL Plus 58/100, Grok Code Fast 1 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking on price and Qwen3-VL Plus for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1, Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking or Qwen3-VL Plus?

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.97 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); Qwen3-VL Plus costs $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.43 per million tokens for Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking versus $0.525 for Grok Code Fast 1 (1.2× as much) and $0.55 for Qwen3-VL Plus (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Grok Code Fast 1 has not been scored yet, Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking has not been scored yet and Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok Code Fast 1, Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking and Qwen3-VL Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-VL Plus has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1 and 65,536 for Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking. Maximum output per response: Grok Code Fast 1 up to 10,000, Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking up to 16,384, Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok Code Fast 1 accepts text; Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking accepts text, images, audio and video; Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3-VL Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-VL Plus is the newest, released Sep 23, 2025. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking came out Sep 22, 2025; Grok Code Fast 1 came out Sep 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.