Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3-VL Plus
Qwen3-VL Plus comes out ahead, 58 to 51 and 48 on our weighted score.
xAIGrok Code Fast 1
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.50
- Context256K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Coder Flash
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.50
- Context1M
- Our pickAlibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3-VL Plus
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.60
- Context262K
Qwen3-VL Plus is our pick
Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen3 Coder Flash (51) and Grok Code Fast 1 (48). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Flash wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGrok Code Fast 1Grok Code Fast 1 $0.525 · Qwen3-VL Plus $0.55 · Qwen3 Coder Flash $0.60 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3 Coder Flash 1,000,000 · Qwen3-VL Plus 262,144 · Grok Code Fast 1 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3-VL PlusGrok Code Fast 1: Text · Qwen3 Coder Flash: Text · Qwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Grok Code Fast 1 | Qwen3 Coder Flash | Qwen3-VL Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 60 | 58 | 60 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 60 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 51/100 | 58/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok Code Fast 1xAI | Qwen3 Coder FlashAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 (best) | $0.30 | $0.20 (best) |
| Output | $1.50 (best) | $1.50 (best) | $1.60 |
| Cached input | — | $0.06 | $0.04 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.525 (best) | $0.60 | $0.55 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.50 / $2.50 | Over 32K: $0.30 / $2.40 |
| Price source | Median of 5 providers | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 10,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | qwen3-coder-flash | qwen3-vl-plus |
| API providers | 7 | 10 (best) | 6 |
| Released | Sep 2, 2025 | Jul 28, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok Code Fast 1$5.00
- Qwen3 Coder Flash$6.00
- Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok Code Fast 1, Qwen3 Coder Flash or Qwen3-VL Plus?
Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen3 Coder Flash (51) and Grok Code Fast 1 (48). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Flash wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1, Qwen3 Coder Flash or Qwen3-VL Plus?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Qwen3-VL Plus costs $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.30 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for Grok Code Fast 1 versus $0.55 for Qwen3-VL Plus (1× as much) and $0.60 for Qwen3 Coder Flash (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Grok Code Fast 1 has not been scored yet, Qwen3 Coder Flash has not been scored yet and Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok Code Fast 1, Qwen3 Coder Flash and Qwen3-VL Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3-VL Plus and 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1. Maximum output per response: Grok Code Fast 1 up to 10,000, Qwen3 Coder Flash up to 65,536, Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok Code Fast 1 accepts text; Qwen3 Coder Flash accepts text; Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images. Qwen3-VL Plus handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Grok Code Fast 1, Qwen3 Coder Flash and Qwen3-VL Plus are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen3-VL Plus is the newest, released Sep 23, 2025. Grok Code Fast 1 came out Sep 2, 2025; Qwen3 Coder Flash came out Jul 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Coder Flash Apr 2025, Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
