Grok Build 0.1 vs Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 54, Grok Build 0.1 53, Mistral Large 3 52). The right pick depends on what you value most.
xAI
Grok Build 0.1
53/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $2.00
- Context256K
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context262K
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $3.20
- Context262K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 54/100, Grok Build 0.1 53/100, Mistral Large 3 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Large 3 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 $0.75 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 · Grok Build 0.1 $1.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMistral Large 3 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BMistral Large 3 262,144 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · Grok Build 0.1 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BGrok Build 0.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingMistral Large 3 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 43 | 53 | 46 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 60 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 53/100 | 52/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.50 | $0.40 (best) |
| Output | $2.00 | $1.50 (best) | $3.20 |
| Cached input | $0.20 | $0.05 (best) | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.25 | $0.75 (best) | $1.10 |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $2.00 / $4.00 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Mistral API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | grok-build-0.1 | mistral-large-2512 | qwen3.5-122b-a10b |
| API providers | 20 | 17 | 22 (best) |
| Released | Apr 16, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 | Feb 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Nov 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Grok Build 0.1$14.00
Mistral Large 3$8.00
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok Build 0.1, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 54/100, Grok Build 0.1 53/100, Mistral Large 3 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Large 3 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?
Mistral Large 3 is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Mistral Large 3 versus $1.10 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (1.5× as much) and $1.25 for Grok Build 0.1 (1.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Grok Build 0.1 has not been scored yet, Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok Build 0.1, Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 256,000 for Grok Build 0.1. Maximum output per response: Grok Build 0.1 up to 256,000, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok Build 0.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images and video. Grok Build 0.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Grok Build 0.1 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Grok Build 0.1 is the newest, released Apr 16, 2026. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026; Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.