Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning vs GLM-4.6V-Flash vs Jamba Mini
Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning comes out ahead, 72 to 63 and 55 on our weighted score, though Jamba Mini is 9% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
xAIGrok 4 Fast Non Reasoning
72/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.50
- Context2M
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.6V-Flash
63/100- ECI—
- Price$0.161 / $0.559
- Context128K
AI21 LabsJamba Mini
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.40
- Context256K
Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning is our pick
Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against GLM-4.6V-Flash (63) and Jamba Mini (55). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceJamba MiniJamba Mini $0.25 · GLM-4.6V-Flash $0.261 · Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGrok 4 Fast Non ReasoningGrok 4 Fast Non Reasoning 2,000,000 · Jamba Mini 256,000 · GLM-4.6V-Flash 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok 4 Fast Non ReasoningGrok 4 Fast Non Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · GLM-4.6V-Flash: Text, Images, Video · Jamba Mini: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-4.6V-Flash and Jamba MiniPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning | GLM-4.6V-Flash | Jamba Mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 73 | 74 | 75 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 72 | 24 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 72/100 | 63/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4 Fast Non ReasoningxAI | GLM-4.6V-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) | Jamba MiniAI21 Labs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.161 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.50 | $0.559 | $0.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.275 | $0.261 | $0.25 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 7 providers | Median of 2 providers | Official AI21 Labs API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 2,000,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 2,000,000 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | glm-4.6v-flash | jamba-mini |
| API providers | 8 (best) | 6 | 1 |
| Released | Dec 18, 2025 | Dec 8, 2025 | Jan 8, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Aug 22, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning$3.00
- GLM-4.6V-Flash$2.73
- Jamba Mini$2.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning, GLM-4.6V-Flash or Jamba Mini?
Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against GLM-4.6V-Flash (63) and Jamba Mini (55). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning, GLM-4.6V-Flash or Jamba Mini?
Jamba Mini is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price). GLM-4.6V-Flash costs $0.161 input / $0.559 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers; free on Z.AI); Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Jamba Mini versus $0.261 for GLM-4.6V-Flash (1× as much) and $0.275 for Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning has not been scored yet, GLM-4.6V-Flash has not been scored yet and Jamba Mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning, GLM-4.6V-Flash and Jamba Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning has the largest context window at 2,000,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Jamba Mini and 128,000 for GLM-4.6V-Flash. Maximum output per response: Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning up to 2,000,000, GLM-4.6V-Flash up to 32,768, Jamba Mini up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; GLM-4.6V-Flash accepts text, images and video; Jamba Mini accepts text. Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.6V-Flash and Jamba Mini publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Jamba Mini is the newest, released Jan 8, 2026. Grok 4 Fast Non Reasoning came out Dec 18, 2025; GLM-4.6V-Flash came out Dec 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Jamba Mini Aug 22, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
