ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.8 Max 65, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 63, Grok 4.7 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. xAI

    Grok 4.7

    Released Sep 21, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context500K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max

    Released Aug 3, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI156.6
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max 0902

    Released Sep 2, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI155.2
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max 65/100, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 63/100, Grok 4.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityQwen3.8 MaxShared benchmarks: Qwen3.8 Max 78.2% · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 76.3% · Grok 4.7 74.9%
  • Lowest priceSame priceGrok 4.7 $3.00 · Qwen3.8 Max $3.00 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 1,000,000 · Grok 4.7 500,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.7: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok 4.7Qwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Max 0902
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%757876
Price25%272727
Inputs & features15%809080
Context window10%486060
Overall100%61/10065/10063/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok 4.7xAIQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max 0902Alibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—156.6 (best)155.2
ECI rank—#20 of 148 (best)#28 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions92.7% (best)92.7%92.3%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics53.0%74.7% (best)65.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics98.1%99.4%100% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions56.0% (best)45.8%47.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$2.00$2.00
Output$6.00$6.00$6.00
Cached input$0.50$0.25 (best)—
Blended (3:1)$3.00$3.00$3.00
Long-context rateOver 200K: $4.00 / $12.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 6 providers
Limits
Context window500,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output500,000 tokens (best)131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · xhighYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgrok-4.7qwen3.8-max—
API providers1725 (best)6
ReleasedSep 21, 2026Aug 3, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMay 2026——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok 4.7$32.00
  • Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
  • Qwen3.8 Max 0902$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok 4.7, Qwen3.8 Max or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max 65/100, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 63/100, Grok 4.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7, Qwen3.8 Max or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

Grok 4.7, Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 cost the same: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified): Qwen3.8 Max 78.2%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 76.3% and Grok 4.7 74.9%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.7 92.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 92.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 92.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.8 Max 74.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 65.6%, Grok 4.7 53.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.8 Max 0902 100%, Qwen3.8 Max 99.4%, Grok 4.7 98.1%; SimpleQA Verified — Grok 4.7 56.0%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 47.3%, Qwen3.8 Max 45.8%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.7, Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.8 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 500,000 for Grok 4.7. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.7 up to 500,000, Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok 4.7 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Qwen3.8 Max handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Grok 4.7, Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Grok 4.7 is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 came out Sep 2, 2026; Qwen3.8 Max came out Aug 3, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.7 May 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.