Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.8 Max 69, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 67). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max
69/100- ECI156.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
67/100- ECI155.2
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max 69/100, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3.8 MaxCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 155.2
- Lowest priceSame priceQwen3.8 Max $3.00 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 Max | Qwen3.8 Max 0902 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 86 | 85 |
| Price | 25% | 27 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 90 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 67/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3.8 Max 0902Alibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 156.6 (best) | 155.2 |
| ECI rank | #20 of 148 (best) | #28 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 92.7% (best) | 92.3% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 74.7% (best) | 65.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 99.4% | 100% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 45.8% | 47.3% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | $0.25 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 6 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3.8-max | — |
| API providers | 25 (best) | 6 |
| Released | Aug 3, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max 69/100, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?
Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 cost the same: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 (#20 of 148) and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 155.2 (#28 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.5–158.8 vs 153.2–157.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3.8 Max 92.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 92.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.8 Max 74.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 65.6%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.8 Max 0902 100%, Qwen3.8 Max 99.4%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3.8 Max 0902 47.3%, Qwen3.8 Max 45.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.8 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 accepts text, images, PDFs and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is the newest, released Sep 2, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max came out Aug 3, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
