Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Grok 4.6 comes out ahead, 44 to 34 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
xAIGrok 4.6
44/100- ECI156.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context500K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
34/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Grok 4.6 is our pick
Grok 4.6 is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSame priceGrok 4.6 $3.00 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGrok 4.6Grok 4.6 500,000 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok 4.6Grok 4.6: Text, Images · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3.8 2.4T A95BPublishes downloadable weights (qwen3.8-max)
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.6 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 48 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 44/100 | 34/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.6xAI | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 156.6 | — |
| ECI rank | #19 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 94.0% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 66.0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 99.2% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 49.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | $0.50 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Median of 21 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 500,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 500,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Openqwen3.8-max |
| API model ID | grok-4.6 | — |
| API providers | 29 (best) | 21 |
| Released | Aug 12, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 1, 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.6$32.00
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Grok 4.6 is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cost the same: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Grok 4.6 has an ECI of 156.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.6 has the largest context window at 500,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.6 up to 500,000, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.6 accepts text and images; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts text. Grok 4.6 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B publishes its weights (qwen3.8-max) and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.6 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.6 is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B came out Aug 12, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.6 Feb 1, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
