ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) comes out ahead, 68 to 58 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI152.0
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.7 Max

    Released May 21, 2026

    58/100
    • ECI153.7
    • Price$2.50 / $7.50
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.7 Max

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is our pick

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3.7 Max (58). It leads on price and inputs & features. Qwen3.7 Max wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3.7 MaxCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.7 Max 153.7 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.0
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) $1.56 · Qwen3.7 Max $3.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGrok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Qwen3.7 Max 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.7 Max: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 Max
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%8183
Price25%4123
Inputs & features15%8035
Context window10%6060
Overall100%68/10058/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAIQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)152.0153.7 (best)
ECI rank#41 of 148#37 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions89.3%90.9% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics44.9%64.6% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics92.2%95.6% (best)
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—77.3%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions30.2%55.8% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$2.50
Output$2.50 (best)$7.50
Cached input$0.20 (best)$0.50
Blended (3:1)$1.56 (best)$3.75
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output30,000 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgrok-4.20-0309-reasoningqwen3.7-max
API providers1126 (best)
ReleasedMar 9, 2026May 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)$17.50
  • Qwen3.7 Max$40.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3.7 Max (58). It leads on price and inputs & features. Qwen3.7 Max wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Qwen3.7 Max costs $2.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) versus $3.75 for Qwen3.7 Max (2.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.7 Max 153.7 (#37 of 148) and Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.0 (#41 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (151.9–156.0 vs 149.3–154.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3.7 Max 90.9%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 89.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.7 Max 64.6%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 44.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.7 Max 95.6%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 92.2%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3.7 Max 55.8%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 30.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.7 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and Qwen3.7 Max share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) up to 30,000, Qwen3.7 Max up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.7 Max accepts text. Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and Qwen3.7 Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.7 Max is the newest, released May 21, 2026. Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons