ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) comes out ahead, 56 to 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    56/100
    • ECI152.0
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed

    Released Jun 12, 2026

    44/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.90 / $8.00
    • Context262K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is our pick

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) $1.56 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGrok 4.20 (Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
Price50%4125
Inputs & features30%8080
Context window20%6037
Overall100%56/10044/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAIKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)152.0—
ECI rank#41 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions89.3%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics92.2%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions30.2%—
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$1.90
Output$2.50 (best)$8.00
Cached input$0.20—
Blended (3:1)$1.56 (best)$3.42
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output30,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDgrok-4.20-0309-reasoning—
API providers1111
ReleasedMar 9, 2026Jun 12, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)$17.50
  • Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed costs $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) versus $3.42 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (2.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) has an ECI of 152.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) up to 30,000, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is the newest, released Jun 12, 2026. Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.