ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) comes out ahead, 52 to 45 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is 2.1× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base

    Released Feb 24, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.54 / $1.33
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is our pick

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base (45). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base $0.739 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) $1.56 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingQwen3.5 35B-A3B BasePublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base
Price50%3954
Inputs & features30%7035
Context window20%6037
Overall100%52/10045/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAIQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$0.54 (best)
Output$2.50$1.33 (best)
Cached input$0.20—
Blended (3:1)$1.56$0.739 (best)
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output30,000 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0
API model IDgrok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning—
API providers13 (best)1
ReleasedMar 9, 2026Feb 24, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)$17.50
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base$8.07
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base (45). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is cheaper at $0.54 input / $1.33 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.739 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base versus $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (2.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) up to 30,000, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the newest, released Mar 9, 2026. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base came out Feb 24, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons