Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comes out ahead, 49 to 43 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
xAIGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
49/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $2.50
- Context1M
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
43/100- ECI—
- Price$1.30 / $2.61
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is our pick
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent $1.56 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed $1.63 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent: Text, Images, PDFs · MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 41 | 40 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 55 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 49/100 | 43/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 (best) | $1.30 |
| Output | $2.50 (best) | $2.61 |
| Cached input | $0.20 | $0.011 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.56 (best) | $1.63 |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $5.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 30,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309 | mimo-v2.5-pro-ultraspeed |
| API providers | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Mar 9, 2026 | Jun 8, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Dec 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent$17.50
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed$18.27
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $1.30 input / $2.61 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent versus $1.63 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent up to 30,000, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts text, images and PDFs; MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is the newest, released Jun 8, 2026. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-5-TurboThree-way comparison
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs GLM-5-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Sakana NamazuSakana AI
