ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Granite-4.0-H-Micro vs Qwen3.5 2B vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507

Qwen3.5 2B comes out ahead, 78 to 62 and 61 on our weighted score.

  1. IBM

    Granite-4.0-H-Micro

    Released Oct 2, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.018 / $0.115
    • Context131K
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 2B

    Released Mar 2, 2026

    78/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.02 / $0.10
    • Context262K
  3. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Mini 3B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.04 / $0.04
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Qwen3.5 2B is our pick

Qwen3.5 2B is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Granite-4.0-H-Micro (62) and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 2B and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Qwen3.5 2B $0.04 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 $0.04 · Granite-4.0-H-Micro $0.042 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.5 2BQwen3.5 2B 262,144 · Granite-4.0-H-Micro 131,072 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 2BGranite-4.0-H-Micro: Text · Qwen3.5 2B: Text, Images, Video · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507: Text, Audio
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGranite-4.0-H-MicroQwen3.5 2BVoxtral Mini 3B 2507
Price50%100100100
Inputs & features30%257035
Context window20%25370
Overall100%62/10078/10061/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Granite-4.0-H-Micro vs Qwen3.5 2B vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 specifications side by side
SpecificationGranite-4.0-H-MicroIBMQwen3.5 2BAlibaba (Qwen)Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.018 (best)$0.02$0.04
Output$0.115$0.10$0.04 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.042$0.04 (best)$0.04 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersMedian of 1 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)81,920 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache-2.0OpenApache 2.0
API model ID———
API providers223 (best)
ReleasedOct 2, 2025Mar 2, 2026Jul 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Granite-4.0-H-Micro$0.405
  • Qwen3.5 2B$0.40
  • Voxtral Mini 3B 2507$0.48
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Granite-4.0-H-Micro, Qwen3.5 2B or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?

Qwen3.5 2B is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Granite-4.0-H-Micro (62) and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Granite-4.0-H-Micro, Qwen3.5 2B or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?

Qwen3.5 2B is cheaper at $0.02 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 costs $0.04 input / $0.04 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Granite-4.0-H-Micro costs $0.018 input / $0.115 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 2B versus $0.04 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (1× as much) and $0.042 for Granite-4.0-H-Micro (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Granite-4.0-H-Micro has not been scored yet, Qwen3.5 2B has not been scored yet and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Granite-4.0-H-Micro, Qwen3.5 2B and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 2B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Granite-4.0-H-Micro and 32,768 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507. Maximum output per response: Granite-4.0-H-Micro up to 131,072, Qwen3.5 2B up to 81,920, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Granite-4.0-H-Micro accepts text; Qwen3.5 2B accepts text, images and video; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 accepts text and audio. Qwen3.5 2B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0 and Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.5 2B is the newest, released Mar 2, 2026. Granite-4.0-H-Micro came out Oct 2, 2025; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.