ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Muse Spark 1.3 comes out ahead, 73 to 68 and 66 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-6 Astra

    Released Sep 4, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI166.5
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Muse Spark 1.3

    Released Sep 2, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI156.9
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
  3. Anthropic

    Claude Fable 5.1

    Released Sep 1, 2026

    66/100
    • ECI164.8
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Muse Spark 1.3 is our pick

Muse Spark 1.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price and inputs & features. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-6 AstraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 166.5 · Claude Fable 5.1 164.8 · Muse Spark 1.3 156.9
  • Lowest priceMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3 $2.00 · GPT-6 Astra $20.00 · Claude Fable 5.1 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark 1.3GPT-6 Astra 1,050,000 · Muse Spark 1.3 1,048,576 · Claude Fable 5.1 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Spark 1.3GPT-6 Astra: Text, Images, PDFs · Muse Spark 1.3: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Claude Fable 5.1: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%998797
Price25%0360
Inputs & features15%8010080
Context window10%616160
Overall100%68/10073/10066/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Fable 5.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-6 AstraOpenAIMuse Spark 1.3MetaClaude Fable 5.1Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)166.5 (best)156.9164.8
ECI rank#2 of 148 (best)#17 of 148#4 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions95.8%——
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics93.7% (best)74.4%90.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics100% (best)99.2%100% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions75.6% (best)—70.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$10.00$1.25 (best)$10.00
Output$50.00$4.25 (best)$50.00
Cached input$1.00$0.15 (best)$0.25
Blended (3:1)$20.00$2.00 (best)$20.00
Long-context rateOver 272K: $20.00 / $75.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Meta APIOfficial Anthropic API
Limits
Context window1,050,000 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesYes
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-6-astramuse-spark-1.3claude-fable-5-1
API providers261229 (best)
ReleasedSep 4, 2026Sep 2, 2026Sep 1, 2026
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026—Jun 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-6 Astra$200.00
  • Muse Spark 1.3$21.00
  • Claude Fable 5.1$200.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-6 Astra, Muse Spark 1.3 or Claude Fable 5.1?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price and inputs & features. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra, Muse Spark 1.3 or Claude Fable 5.1?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Muse Spark 1.3 versus $20.00 for GPT-6 Astra (10× as much) and $20.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 (10× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 166.5 (#2 of 148), Claude Fable 5.1 164.8 (#4 of 148) and Muse Spark 1.3 156.9 (#17 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (163.1–171.1 vs 161.8–169.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6 Astra 93.7%, Claude Fable 5.1 90.2%, Muse Spark 1.3 74.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6 Astra 100%, Claude Fable 5.1 100%, Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-6 Astra, Muse Spark 1.3 and Claude Fable 5.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Astra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark 1.3 have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.1. Maximum output per response: GPT-6 Astra up to 128,000, Muse Spark 1.3 up to 131,072, Claude Fable 5.1 up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-6 Astra accepts text, images and PDFs; Muse Spark 1.3 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. Muse Spark 1.3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-6 Astra, Muse Spark 1.3 and Claude Fable 5.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Astra is the newest, released Sep 4, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3 came out Sep 2, 2026; Claude Fable 5.1 came out Sep 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6 Astra Apr 30, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 Jun 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.