GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Haiku 5.5 comes out ahead, 83 to 68 and 66 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra
68/100- ECI169.1
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5
83/100- ECI160.4
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context1M
- Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
66/100- ECI166.4
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
Claude Haiku 5.5 is our pick
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-6 AstraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 169.1 · Claude Fable 5.1 166.4 · Claude Haiku 5.5 160.4
- Lowest priceClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.20 · GPT-6 Astra $20.00 · Claude Fable 5.1 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Astra 1,050,000 · Claude Haiku 5.5 1,000,000 · Claude Fable 5.1 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-6 Astra: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Haiku 5.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Fable 5.1: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-6 Astra | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 100 | 89 | 97 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 80 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 83/100 | 66/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 169.1 (best) | 160.4 | 166.4 |
| ECI rank | #1 of 165 (best) | #14 of 165 | #6 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 95.8% (best) | 89.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 93.7% (best) | 75.1% | 90.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% (best) | 98.9% | 100% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 75.6% (best) | 23.8% | 70.8% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $10.00 | $0.10 (best) | $10.00 |
| Output | $50.00 | $0.50 (best) | $50.00 |
| Cached input | $1.00 | $0.01 (best) | $0.25 |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00 | $0.20 (best) | $20.00 |
| Long-context rate | Over 272K: $20.00 / $75.00 | Over 100K: $0.50 / $2.50 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Anthropic API | Official Anthropic API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-6-astra | claude-haiku-5-5 | claude-fable-5-1 |
| API providers | 37 (best) | 33 | 37 (best) |
| Released | Sep 4, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 | Sep 1, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 30, 2026 | Jun 2026 | Jun 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-6 Astra$200.00
- Claude Haiku 5.5$2.00
- Claude Fable 5.1$200.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-6 Astra, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Fable 5.1?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Fable 5.1?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Claude Haiku 5.5 versus $20.00 for GPT-6 Astra (100× as much) and $20.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 (100× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-6 Astra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 169.1 (#1 of 165), Claude Fable 5.1 166.4 (#6 of 165) and Claude Haiku 5.5 160.4 (#14 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (165.9–174.3 vs 163.6–170.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6 Astra 93.7%, Claude Fable 5.1 90.2%, Claude Haiku 5.5 75.1%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6 Astra 100%, Claude Fable 5.1 100%, Claude Haiku 5.5 98.9%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-6 Astra 75.6%, Claude Fable 5.1 70.8%, Claude Haiku 5.5 23.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-6 Astra, Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Astra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.1. Maximum output per response: GPT-6 Astra up to 128,000, Claude Haiku 5.5 up to 128,000, Claude Fable 5.1 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-6 Astra accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-6 Astra, Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the newest, released Oct 7, 2026. GPT-6 Astra came out Sep 4, 2026; Claude Fable 5.1 came out Sep 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6 Astra Apr 30, 2026, Claude Haiku 5.5 Jun 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 Jun 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- GPT-6 Astra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle · ECI 166.1
- GPT-6 Astra vs Muse WonderMeta · ECI 161.7
- GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 158.3
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek · ECI 158.8
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaOpenAI · ECI 156.8
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 153.2
