ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GPT-6 Astra (Fast) vs Apodex 1.1 Mini vs Claude Mythos 5

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-6 Astra (Fast) 66, Claude Mythos 5 66, Apodex 1.1 Mini 36). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-6 Astra (Fast)

    Released Sep 4, 2026New

    66/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$20.00 / $100.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Apodex

    Apodex 1.1 Mini

    Released Aug 24, 2026

    36/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context262K
  3. Anthropic

    Claude Mythos 5

    Released Jun 9, 2026

    66/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-6 Astra (Fast) 66/100, Claude Mythos 5 66/100, Apodex 1.1 Mini 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Mythos 5 on price and GPT-6 Astra (Fast) for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceClaude Mythos 5Claude Mythos 5 $20.00 · GPT-6 Astra (Fast) $40.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Apodex 1.1 Mini unpriced
  • Longest contextGPT-6 Astra (Fast)GPT-6 Astra (Fast) 1,050,000 · Claude Mythos 5 1,000,000 · Apodex 1.1 Mini 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-6 Astra (Fast) and Claude Mythos 5GPT-6 Astra (Fast): Text, Images, PDFs · Apodex 1.1 Mini: Text · Claude Mythos 5: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingApodex 1.1 MiniPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-6 Astra (Fast)Apodex 1.1 MiniClaude Mythos 5
Inputs & features60%703570
Context window40%613760
Overall100%66/10036/10066/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-6 Astra (Fast) vs Apodex 1.1 Mini vs Claude Mythos 5 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-6 Astra (Fast)OpenAIApodex 1.1 MiniApodexClaude Mythos 5Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$20.00—$10.00 (best)
Output$100.00—$50.00 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$40.00—$20.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rate—Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providers—Median of 2 providers
Limits
Context window1,050,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0Proprietary
API model ID———
API providers112 (best)
ReleasedSep 4, 2026Aug 24, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Jan 31, 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-6 Astra (Fast)$400.00
  • Apodex 1.1 Mini—
  • Claude Mythos 5$200.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-6 Astra (Fast), Apodex 1.1 Mini or Claude Mythos 5?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-6 Astra (Fast) 66/100, Claude Mythos 5 66/100, Apodex 1.1 Mini 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Mythos 5 on price and GPT-6 Astra (Fast) for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra (Fast), Apodex 1.1 Mini or Claude Mythos 5?

Claude Mythos 5 is cheaper at $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). GPT-6 Astra (Fast) costs $20.00 input / $100.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $20.00 per million tokens for Claude Mythos 5 versus $40.00 for GPT-6 Astra (Fast) (2× as much). Apodex 1.1 Mini has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-6 Astra (Fast) has not been scored yet, Apodex 1.1 Mini has not been scored yet and Claude Mythos 5 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-6 Astra (Fast), Apodex 1.1 Mini and Claude Mythos 5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra (Fast) has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Mythos 5 and 262,144 for Apodex 1.1 Mini. Maximum output per response: GPT-6 Astra (Fast) up to 128,000, Apodex 1.1 Mini up to 262,144, Claude Mythos 5 up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-6 Astra (Fast) accepts text, images and PDFs; Apodex 1.1 Mini accepts text; Claude Mythos 5 accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-6 Astra (Fast) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Apodex 1.1 Mini publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; GPT-6 Astra (Fast) and Claude Mythos 5 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Astra (Fast) is the newest, released Sep 4, 2026. Apodex 1.1 Mini came out Aug 24, 2026; Claude Mythos 5 came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Mythos 5 Jan 31, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.