ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Wonder vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

GPT-6.1 Terra comes out ahead, 76 to 72 and 68 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-6.1 Terra

    Released Oct 26, 2026New

    76/100
    • ECI168.1
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Meta

    Muse Wonder

    Released Oct 12, 2026New

    68/100
    • ECI161.7
    • Price$4.00 / $20.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Anthropic

    Claude Sonnet 5.5

    Released Sep 28, 2026New

    72/100
    • ECI166.7
    • Price$2.00 / $10.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

GPT-6.1 Terra is our pick

GPT-6.1 Terra is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (72) and Muse Wonder (68). It leads on capability and price. Muse Wonder wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-6.1 TerraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6.1 Terra 168.1 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 166.7 · Muse Wonder 161.7
  • Lowest priceGPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 Terra $2.00 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 $4.00 · Muse Wonder $8.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6.1 Terra and Muse WonderGPT-6.1 Terra 1,050,000 · Muse Wonder 1,048,576 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse WonderGPT-6.1 Terra: Text, Images, PDFs · Muse Wonder: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Claude Sonnet 5.5: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-6.1 TerraMuse WonderClaude Sonnet 5.5
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%999197
Price25%34720
Inputs & features15%8010080
Context window10%616160
Overall100%76/10068/10072/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Wonder vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIMuse WonderMetaClaude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)168.1 (best)161.7166.7
ECI rank#3 of 165 (best)#13 of 165#5 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions94.3%—95.6% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics90.9% (best)82.1%88.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics100% (best)99.4%100% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions57.3% (best)—46.5%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00 (best)$4.00$2.00
Output$5.00 (best)$20.00$10.00
Cached input$0.05 (best)$0.20$0.10
Blended (3:1)$2.00 (best)$8.00$4.00
Long-context rateOver 272K: $2.00 / $7.50Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Meta APIOfficial Anthropic API
Limits
Context window1,050,000 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesYes
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-6.1-terramuse-wonder-1.0claude-sonnet-5-5
API providers22934 (best)
ReleasedOct 26, 2026Oct 12, 2026Sep 28, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2026—Jun 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-6.1 Terra$20.00
  • Muse Wonder$80.00
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5$40.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-6.1 Terra, Muse Wonder or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

GPT-6.1 Terra is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (72) and Muse Wonder (68). It leads on capability and price. Muse Wonder wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra, Muse Wonder or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

GPT-6.1 Terra is cheaper at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); Muse Wonder costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for GPT-6.1 Terra versus $4.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 (2× as much) and $8.00 for Muse Wonder (4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-6.1 Terra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6.1 Terra 168.1 (#3 of 165), Claude Sonnet 5.5 166.7 (#5 of 165) and Muse Wonder 161.7 (#13 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (164.9–172.9 vs 163.6–171.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6.1 Terra 90.9%, Claude Sonnet 5.5 88.8%, Muse Wonder 82.1%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6.1 Terra 100%, Claude Sonnet 5.5 100%, Muse Wonder 99.4%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-6.1 Terra, Muse Wonder and Claude Sonnet 5.5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6.1 Terra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Wonder have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.5. Maximum output per response: GPT-6.1 Terra up to 128,000, Muse Wonder up to 131,072, Claude Sonnet 5.5 up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-6.1 Terra accepts text, images and PDFs; Muse Wonder accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts text, images and PDFs. Muse Wonder handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-6.1 Terra, Muse Wonder and Claude Sonnet 5.5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

GPT-6.1 Terra is the newest, released Oct 26, 2026. Muse Wonder came out Oct 12, 2026; Claude Sonnet 5.5 came out Sep 28, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6.1 Terra Jun 1, 2026, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Jun 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.