GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4
GPT-6.1 Terra comes out ahead, 76 to 67 on our weighted score, though Mistral Large 4 is 48% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Terra
76/100- ECI168.1
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context1.05M
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 4
67/100- ECI150.6
- Price$0.70 / $2.10
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-6.1 Terra is our pick
GPT-6.1 Terra is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Mistral Large 4 (67). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Mistral Large 4 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-6.1 TerraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6.1 Terra 168.1 · Mistral Large 4 150.6
- Lowest priceMistral Large 4Mistral Large 4 $1.05 · GPT-6.1 Terra $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-6.1 Terra 1,050,000 · Mistral Large 4 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 Terra: Text, Images, PDFs · Mistral Large 4: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-6.1 Terra | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 99 | 77 |
| Price | 25% | 34 | 47 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 76/100 | 67/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 168.1 (best) | 150.6 |
| ECI rank | #3 of 165 (best) | #57 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 94.3% (best) | 88.1% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 90.9% (best) | 58.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% (best) | 98.3% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 57.3% (best) | 20.0% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.70 (best) |
| Output | $5.00 | $2.10 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.05 (best) | $0.07 |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $1.05 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 272K: $2.00 / $7.50 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-6.1-terra | mistral-large-4 |
| API providers | 22 (best) | 15 |
| Released | Oct 26, 2026 | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 1, 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-6.1 Terra$20.00
Mistral Large 4$11.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-6.1 Terra or Mistral Large 4?
GPT-6.1 Terra is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Mistral Large 4 (67). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Mistral Large 4 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.70 input / $2.10 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.05 per million tokens for Mistral Large 4 versus $2.00 for GPT-6.1 Terra (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-6.1 Terra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6.1 Terra 168.1 (#3 of 165) and Mistral Large 4 150.6 (#57 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (164.9–172.9 vs 147.4–153.5), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-6.1 Terra 94.3%, Mistral Large 4 88.1%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6.1 Terra 90.9%, Mistral Large 4 58.6%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6.1 Terra 100%, Mistral Large 4 98.3%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-6.1 Terra 57.3%, Mistral Large 4 20.0%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-6.1 Terra and Mistral Large 4 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6.1 Terra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Their context windows are effectively the same size: GPT-6.1 Terra 1,050,000 and Mistral Large 4 1,048,576 tokens. Maximum output per response: GPT-6.1 Terra up to 128,000, Mistral Large 4 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-6.1 Terra accepts text, images and PDFs; Mistral Large 4 accepts text and images. GPT-6.1 Terra handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-6.1 Terra and Mistral Large 4 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-6.1 Terra is the newest, released Oct 26, 2026. Mistral Large 4 came out Oct 6, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6.1 Terra Jun 1, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.