GPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 4 Argon
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 4 Argon 74, GPT-6.1 Sol 72). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol
72/100- ECI167.8
- Price$2.00 / $10.00
- Context1.05M
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
74/100- ECI166.1
- Price$2.00 / $10.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 4 Argon 74/100, GPT-6.1 Sol 72/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-6.1 Sol for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-6.1 SolCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6.1 Sol 167.8 · Gemini 4 Argon 166.1
- Lowest priceSame priceGPT-6.1 Sol $4.00 · Gemini 4 Argon $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-6.1 Sol 1,050,000 · Gemini 4 Argon 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Sol: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 4 Argon: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-6.1 Sol | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 99 | 96 |
| Price | 25% | 20 | 20 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 100 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 72/100 | 74/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 167.8 (best) | 166.1 |
| ECI rank | #4 of 165 (best) | #7 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 95.4% | 96.4% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 93.7% (best) | 86.0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% | 100% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 73.9% | 76.0% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $10.00 | $10.00 |
| Cached input | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.00 | $4.00 |
| Long-context rate | Over 272K: $4.00 / $15.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-6.1-sol | gemini-4-argon |
| API providers | 33 (best) | 24 |
| Released | Sep 29, 2026 | Oct 13, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 30, 2026 | Mar 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-6.1 Sol$40.00
Gemini 4 Argon$40.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-6.1 Sol or Gemini 4 Argon?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 4 Argon 74/100, GPT-6.1 Sol 72/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-6.1 Sol for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Gemini 4 Argon?
GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon cost the same: $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6.1 Sol 167.8 (#4 of 165) and Gemini 4 Argon 166.1 (#7 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (164.3–172.5 vs 163.1–170.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 4 Argon 96.4%, GPT-6.1 Sol 95.4%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6.1 Sol 93.7%, Gemini 4 Argon 86.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6.1 Sol 100%, Gemini 4 Argon 100%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 4 Argon 76.0%, GPT-6.1 Sol 73.9%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6.1 Sol leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Their context windows are effectively the same size: GPT-6.1 Sol 1,050,000 and Gemini 4 Argon 1,048,576 tokens. Maximum output per response: GPT-6.1 Sol up to 128,000, Gemini 4 Argon up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-6.1 Sol accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 4 Argon accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 4 Argon handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 4 Argon is the newest, released Oct 13, 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol came out Sep 29, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6.1 Sol Apr 30, 2026, Gemini 4 Argon Mar 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.