GPT-5 Chat vs Morph V3 Fast vs Qwen MT Plus
Too close to call on our weighted score (Morph V3 Fast 32, GPT-5 Chat 31, Qwen MT Plus 11). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAI
GPT-5 Chat
31/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context400K
Morph
Morph V3 Fast
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $1.20
- Context262K
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen MT Plus
11/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Morph V3 Fast 32/100, GPT-5 Chat 31/100, Qwen MT Plus 11/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Morph V3 Fast on price and GPT-5 Chat for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast $0.90 · GPT-5 Chat $3.44 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5 ChatGPT-5 Chat 400,000 · Morph V3 Fast 262,144 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5 ChatGPT-5 Chat: Text, Images · Morph V3 Fast: Text · Qwen MT Plus: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5 Chat | Morph V3 Fast | Qwen MT Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 23 | 50 | 22 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 44 | 37 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 31/100 | 32/100 | 11/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Morph V3 FastMorph | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.25 | $0.80 (best) | $2.46 |
| Output | $10.00 | $1.20 (best) | $7.37 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.44 | $0.90 (best) | $3.69 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 5 providers | Median of 5 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | No | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | qwen-mt-plus |
| API providers | 5 (best) | 5 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Aug 7, 2025 | Jul 7, 2025 | Jul 24, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 30, 2024 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-5 Chat$32.50
- Morph V3 Fast$10.40
Qwen MT Plus$39.34
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5 Chat, Morph V3 Fast or Qwen MT Plus?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Morph V3 Fast 32/100, GPT-5 Chat 31/100, Qwen MT Plus 11/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Morph V3 Fast on price and GPT-5 Chat for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Chat, Morph V3 Fast or Qwen MT Plus?
Morph V3 Fast is cheaper at $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). GPT-5 Chat costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Morph V3 Fast versus $3.44 for GPT-5 Chat (3.8× as much) and $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (4.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5 Chat has not been scored yet, Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet and Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5 Chat, Morph V3 Fast and Qwen MT Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that GPT-5 Chat, Morph V3 Fast and Qwen MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5 Chat has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Morph V3 Fast and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: GPT-5 Chat up to 128,000, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5 Chat accepts text and images; Morph V3 Fast accepts text; Qwen MT Plus accepts text. GPT-5 Chat handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5 Chat, Morph V3 Fast and Qwen MT Plus are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-5 Chat is the newest, released Aug 7, 2025. Qwen MT Plus came out Jul 24, 2025; Morph V3 Fast came out Jul 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5 Chat Sep 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.