ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.2 vs Kimi K3

Muse Spark 1.2 comes out ahead, 71 to 67 and 65 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.6 Terra

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI160.1
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Muse Spark 1.2

    Released Aug 5, 2026

    71/100
    • ECI155.2
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
  3. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K3

    Released Jul 16, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI158.3
    • Price$3.00 / $15.00
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Muse Spark 1.2 is our pick

Muse Spark 1.2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against GPT-5.6 Terra (67) and Kimi K3 (65). It leads on price and inputs & features. GPT-5.6 Terra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.6 TerraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.6 Terra 160.1 · Kimi K3 158.3 · Muse Spark 1.2 155.2
  • Lowest priceMuse Spark 1.2Muse Spark 1.2 $2.00 · GPT-5.6 Terra $4.50 · Kimi K3 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-5.6 Terra 1,050,000 · Muse Spark 1.2 1,048,576 · Kimi K3 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Spark 1.2GPT-5.6 Terra: Text, Images, PDFs · Muse Spark 1.2: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Kimi K3: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.6 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Kimi K3
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%898387
Price25%183412
Inputs & features15%8010080
Context window10%616161
Overall100%67/10071/10065/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.2 vs Kimi K3 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIMuse Spark 1.2MetaKimi K3Moonshot AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)160.1 (best)155.2158.3
ECI rank#15 of 165 (best)#38 of 165#20 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions93.3% (best)—93.1%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics86.0% (best)—72.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics99.7% (best)—97.2%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions43.2%60.3% (best)50.6%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$1.25 (best)$3.00
Output$12.00$4.25 (best)$15.00
Cached input$0.20$0.15 (best)$0.30
Blended (3:1)$4.50$2.00 (best)$6.00
Long-context rateOver 272K: $4.00 / $18.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Meta APIOfficial Moonshot AI API
Limits
Context window1,050,000 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhighYeslow · high · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDgpt-5.6-terramuse-spark-1.2kimi-k3
API providers451876 (best)
ReleasedJul 9, 2026Aug 5, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Knowledge cutoffFeb 16, 2026——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.6 Terra$44.00
  • Muse Spark 1.2$21.00
  • Kimi K3$60.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.6 Terra, Muse Spark 1.2 or Kimi K3?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against GPT-5.6 Terra (67) and Kimi K3 (65). It leads on price and inputs & features. GPT-5.6 Terra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra, Muse Spark 1.2 or Kimi K3?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Kimi K3 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Muse Spark 1.2 versus $4.50 for GPT-5.6 Terra (2.3× as much) and $6.00 for Kimi K3 (3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.6 Terra 160.1 (#15 of 165), Kimi K3 158.3 (#20 of 165) and Muse Spark 1.2 155.2 (#38 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (157.8–163.4 vs 155.8–161.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Muse Spark 1.2 60.3%, Kimi K3 50.6%, GPT-5.6 Terra 43.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Terra, Muse Spark 1.2 and Kimi K3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.6 Terra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Their context windows are effectively the same size: GPT-5.6 Terra 1,050,000, Muse Spark 1.2 1,048,576 and Kimi K3 1,048,576 tokens. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.6 Terra up to 128,000, Muse Spark 1.2 up to 131,072, Kimi K3 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.6 Terra accepts text, images and PDFs; Muse Spark 1.2 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Kimi K3 accepts text, images and video. Muse Spark 1.2 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.6 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the newest, released Aug 5, 2026. Kimi K3 came out Jul 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Terra came out Jul 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Terra Feb 16, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.