ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.3 Chat vs Kimi K3

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5.4 43, Kimi K3 43, GPT-5.3 Chat 32). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.4

    Released Mar 5, 2026

    43/100
    • ECI156.9
    • Price$2.50 / $15.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Chat

    Released Mar 3, 2026Deprecated

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context128K
  3. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K3

    Released Jul 16, 2026

    43/100
    • ECI157.6
    • Price$3.00 / $15.00
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-5.4 43/100, Kimi K3 43/100, GPT-5.3 Chat 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.3 Chat on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-5.3 ChatGPT-5.3 Chat $4.81 · GPT-5.4 $5.63 · Kimi K3 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.4 and Kimi K3GPT-5.4 1,050,000 · Kimi K3 1,048,576 · GPT-5.3 Chat 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.4 and Kimi K3GPT-5.4: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-5.3 Chat: Text, Images · Kimi K3: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.4GPT-5.3 ChatKimi K3
Price50%141813
Inputs & features30%806080
Context window20%612461
Overall100%43/10032/10043/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.3 Chat vs Kimi K3 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.4OpenAIGPT-5.3 ChatOpenAIKimi K3Moonshot AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.9—157.6 (best)
ECI rank#16 of 148—#13 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions93.3% (best)—93.1%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics78.6% (best)—72.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics97.8% (best)—97.2%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues76.9%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions45.1%—50.6% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.50$1.75 (best)$3.00
Output$15.00$14.00 (best)$15.00
Cached input$0.25$0.175 (best)$0.30
Blended (3:1)$5.63$4.81 (best)$6.00
Long-context rateOver 272K: $5.00 / $22.50Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Moonshot AI API
Limits
Context window1,050,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens16,384 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighNoYeslow · high · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDgpt-5.4gpt-5.3-chat-latestkimi-k3
API providers36468 (best)
ReleasedMar 5, 2026Mar 3, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025Aug 31, 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.4$55.00
  • GPT-5.3 Chat$45.50
  • Kimi K3$60.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.4, GPT-5.3 Chat or Kimi K3?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-5.4 43/100, Kimi K3 43/100, GPT-5.3 Chat 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.3 Chat on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.3 Chat or Kimi K3?

GPT-5.3 Chat is cheaper at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Kimi K3 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.81 per million tokens for GPT-5.3 Chat versus $5.63 for GPT-5.4 (1.2× as much) and $6.00 for Kimi K3 (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5.4 has an ECI of 156.9, GPT-5.3 Chat has not been scored yet and Kimi K3 has an ECI of 157.6.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.3 Chat and Kimi K3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 and Kimi K3 have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 128,000 for GPT-5.3 Chat. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 up to 128,000, GPT-5.3 Chat up to 16,384, Kimi K3 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.4 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-5.3 Chat accepts text and images; Kimi K3 accepts text, images and video. GPT-5.4 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.3 Chat is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K3 is the newest, released Jul 16, 2026. GPT-5.4 came out Mar 5, 2026; GPT-5.3 Chat came out Mar 3, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 Aug 31, 2025, GPT-5.3 Chat Aug 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.