ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Ling-1T

GPT-5.1 Codex mini comes out ahead, 59 to 37 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-5.1 Codex mini

    Released Nov 13, 2025

    59/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $2.00
    • Context400K
    Full specs Remove GPT-5.1 Codex mini

  2. inclusionAI

    Ling-1T

    Released Oct 2025

    37/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.57 / $2.29
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Ling-1T

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is our pick

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Ling-1T (37). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-5.1 Codex miniGPT-5.1 Codex mini $0.688 · Ling-1T $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.1 Codex miniGPT-5.1 Codex mini 400,000 · Ling-1T 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.1 Codex miniGPT-5.1 Codex mini: Text, Images · Ling-1T: Text
  • Self-hostingLing-1TPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.1 Codex miniLing-1T
Price50%5850
Inputs & features30%7025
Context window20%4424
Overall100%59/10037/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Ling-1T specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.1 Codex miniOpenAILing-1TinclusionAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.25 (best)$0.57
Output$2.00 (best)$2.29
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.688 (best)$1.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 10 providersOfficial Bailing API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens (best)32,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model ID—Ling-1T
API providers10 (best)1
ReleasedNov 13, 2025Oct 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 30, 2024Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.1 Codex mini$6.50
  • Ling-1T$10.28
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.1 Codex mini or Ling-1T?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Ling-1T (37). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Codex mini or Ling-1T?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is cheaper at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). Ling-1T costs $0.57 input / $2.29 output per million tokens (official Bailing API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.688 per million tokens for GPT-5.1 Codex mini versus $1.00 for Ling-1T (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GPT-5.1 Codex mini has not been scored yet and Ling-1T has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.1 Codex mini and Ling-1T yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Ling-1T. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.1 Codex mini up to 128,000, Ling-1T up to 32,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini accepts text and images; Ling-1T accepts text. GPT-5.1 Codex mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Ling-1T publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.1 Codex mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is the newest, released Nov 13, 2025. Ling-1T came out Oct 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.1 Codex mini Sep 30, 2024, Ling-1T Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons