GPT-4o vs Gemma 2 27B
GPT-4o comes out ahead, 43 to 35 on our weighted score, though Gemma 2 27B is 6.7× cheaper per token.
- Our pick
OpenAI
GPT-4o
43/100- ECI129.0
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
Google
Gemma 2 27B
35/100- ECI122.1
- Price$0.65 / $0.65
- Context8K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-4o is our pick
GPT-4o is the better all-round choice, scoring 43/100 against Gemma 2 27B (35). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-4oCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o 129.0 · Gemma 2 27B 122.1
- Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · GPT-4o $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-4oGPT-4o 128,000 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4oGPT-4o: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemma 2 27B: Text
- Self-hostingGemma 2 27BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4o | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 51 | 42 |
| Price | 25% | 19 | 56 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 0 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 43/100 | 35/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 129.0 (best) | 122.1 |
| ECI rank | #141 of 165 (best) | #152 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 48.9% (best) | 36.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 6.3% (best) | 1.4% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.50 | $0.65 (best) |
| Output | $10.00 | $0.65 (best) |
| Cached input | $1.25 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.65 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens (best) | 2,048 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-4o | — |
| API providers | 26 (best) | 3 |
| Released | May 13, 2024 | Jul 13, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2023 | Jun 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-4o$45.00
Gemma 2 27B$7.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4o or Gemma 2 27B?
GPT-4o is the better all-round choice, scoring 43/100 against Gemma 2 27B (35). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Gemma 2 27B?
Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). GPT-4o costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $4.38 for GPT-4o (6.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-4o scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o 129.0 (#141 of 165) and Gemma 2 27B 122.1 (#152 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (124.7–131.3 vs 115.8–124.1), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-4o 48.9%, Gemma 2 27B 36.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-4o 6.3%, Gemma 2 27B 1.4%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o and Gemma 2 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4o leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4o has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o up to 16,384, Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4o accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemma 2 27B accepts text. GPT-4o handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma 2 27B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemma 2 27B is the newest, released Jul 13, 2024. GPT-4o came out May 13, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o Sep 2023, Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.