ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 56 and 44 on our weighted score, though GPT-4o mini is 23% cheaper per token.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-4o mini

    Released Jul 18, 2024

    56/100
    • ECI126.6
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context128K
  2. Meta

    Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    44/100
    • ECI125.9
    • Price$0.72 / $0.72
    • Context128K
  3. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI129.7
    • Price$0.225 / $0.69
    • Context10M
01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GPT-4o mini (56) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on capability and context window. GPT-4o mini wins on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 · GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9
  • Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · GPT-4o mini 128,000 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct: Text · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-4o miniLlama-3.1-70B-InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%494852
Price25%775772
Inputs & features15%702550
Context window10%2424100
Overall100%56/10044/10062/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-4o miniOpenAILlama-3.1-70B-InstructMetaLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)126.6125.9129.7 (best)
ECI rank#135 of 148#136 of 148#126 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions37.7%44.2%51.8% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics0.7%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics6.9%3.6%7.8% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions8.3%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.72$0.225
Output$0.60 (best)$0.72$0.69
Cached input$0.075——
Blended (3:1)$0.263 (best)$0.72$0.341
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 5 providersMedian of 4 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens (best)4,096 tokens16,384 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDgpt-4o-mini——
API providers21 (best)54
ReleasedJul 18, 2024Jul 23, 2024Apr 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 2023Dec 2023Aug 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-4o mini$2.70
  • Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct$8.64
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GPT-4o mini (56) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on capability and context window. GPT-4o mini wins on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct costs $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.341 for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (1.3× as much) and $0.72 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (2.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148), GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 (#136 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (124.8–131.4 vs 120.5–128.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 44.2%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%, GPT-4o mini 6.9%, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 3.6%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-4o mini and 128,000 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct accepts text; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images. GPT-4o mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 5, 2025. Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024; GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.