GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 56 on our weighted score, though GPT-4o mini is 23% cheaper per token.
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
56/100- ECI126.6
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
- Our pick
Meta
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
62/100- ECI129.7
- Price$0.225 / $0.69
- Context10M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GPT-4o mini (56). It leads on capability and context window. GPT-4o mini wins on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 · GPT-4o mini 126.6
- Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · GPT-4o mini 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4o mini | Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 49 | 52 |
| Price | 25% | 77 | 72 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 50 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 100 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 62/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 126.6 | 129.7 (best) |
| ECI rank | #135 of 148 | #126 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 37.7% | 51.8% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 6.9% | 7.8% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 8.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | $0.225 |
| Output | $0.60 (best) | $0.69 |
| Cached input | $0.075 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.263 (best) | $0.341 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 4 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-4o-mini | — |
| API providers | 21 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Jul 18, 2024 | Apr 5, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2023 | Aug 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-4o mini$2.70
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4o mini or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GPT-4o mini (56). It leads on capability and context window. GPT-4o mini wins on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct costs $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.341 for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148) and GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (124.8–131.4 vs 120.5–128.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%, GPT-4o mini 6.9%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-4o mini. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images. GPT-4o mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 5, 2025. GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.