GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B
Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-4.1 53, Qwen3 235B-A22B 51). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAIGPT-4.1
53/100- ECI136.8
- Price$2.00 / $8.00
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 235B-A22B
51/100- ECI139.4
- Price$0.70 / $2.80
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 53/100, Qwen3 235B-A22B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 235B-A22B for raw capability and GPT-4.1 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3 235B-A22BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4 · GPT-4.1 136.8
- Lowest priceQwen3 235B-A22BQwen3 235B-A22B $1.23 · GPT-4.1 $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-4.1GPT-4.1 1,047,576 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4.1GPT-4.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3 235B-A22B: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4.1 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 61 | 65 |
| Price | 25% | 24 | 46 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 53/100 | 51/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-4.1OpenAI | Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 136.8 | 139.4 (best) |
| ECI rank | #111 of 148 | #103 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 66.9% | 70.7% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 6.0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 38.3% | — |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 48.5% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 31.1% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.70 (best) |
| Output | $8.00 | $2.80 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.50 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.50 | $1.23 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,047,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-4.1 | qwen3-235b-a22b |
| API providers | 25 (best) | 7 |
| Released | Apr 14, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-4.1$36.00
- Qwen3 235B-A22B$12.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 53/100, Qwen3 235B-A22B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 235B-A22B for raw capability and GPT-4.1 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.23 per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B versus $3.50 for GPT-4.1 (2.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4 (#103 of 148) and GPT-4.1 136.8 (#111 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (135.2–140.8 vs 133.6–138.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3 235B-A22B 70.7%, GPT-4.1 66.9%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 235B-A22B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 235B-A22B. Maximum output per response: GPT-4.1 up to 32,768, Qwen3 235B-A22B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts text. GPT-4.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 235B-A22B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4.1 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 235B-A22B is the newest, released Apr 28, 2025. GPT-4.1 came out Apr 14, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4.1 Apr 2024, Qwen3 235B-A22B Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3 32BThree-way comparison
- GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 32BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 138.5
- GPT-4.1 vs Claude Sonnet 3.7Anthropic · ECI 141.2
- GPT-4.1 vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek · ECI 137.4
- GPT-4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · ECI 145.3
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek · ECI 139.0
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.8
