ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Medium 3 vs o3-pro

GPT-4.1 mini comes out ahead, 60 to 53 and 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-4.1 mini

    Released Apr 14, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI135.0
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1.05M
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  3. OpenAI

    o3-pro

    Released Jun 10, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI147.4
    • Price$20.00 / $80.00
    • Context200K
01 — Verdict

GPT-4.1 mini is our pick

GPT-4.1 mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53) and o3-pro (51). It leads on price and context window. o3-pro wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • Capabilityo3-proCapabilities Index (ECI): o3-pro 147.4 · GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
  • Lowest priceGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini $0.70 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 · o3-pro $35.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini 1,047,576 · o3-pro 200,000 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images · o3-pro: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-4.1 miniMistral Medium 3o3-pro
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%595875
Price25%57540
Inputs & features15%705070
Context window10%612432
Overall100%60/10053/10051/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Medium 3 vs o3-pro specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-4.1 miniOpenAIMistral Medium 3Mistral AIo3-proOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)135.0134.1147.4 (best)
ECI rank#115 of 148#117 of 148#60 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions65.9% (best)59.5%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics6.7%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics44.7% (best)32.2%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions12.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.40 (best)$0.40 (best)$20.00
Output$1.60 (best)$2.00$80.00
Cached input$0.10——
Blended (3:1)$0.70 (best)$0.80$35.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Mistral APIOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window1,047,576 tokens (best)131,072 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens131,072 tokens (best)100,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYeslow · medium · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-4.1-minimistral-medium-2505o3-pro
API providers24 (best)56
ReleasedApr 14, 2025May 7, 2025Jun 10, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2024May 2025May 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-4.1 mini$7.20
  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
  • o3-pro$360.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-4.1 mini, Mistral Medium 3 or o3-pro?

GPT-4.1 mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53) and o3-pro (51). It leads on price and context window. o3-pro wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini, Mistral Medium 3 or o3-pro?

GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); o3-pro costs $20.00 input / $80.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.70 per million tokens for GPT-4.1 mini versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (1.1× as much) and $35.00 for o3-pro (50× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

o3-pro scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): o3-pro 147.4 (#60 of 148), GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 (#115 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (145.8–149.7 vs 131.2–136.6), so the gap is a real one.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4.1 mini, Mistral Medium 3 and o3-pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, o3-pro leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 mini has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 200,000 for o3-pro and 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: GPT-4.1 mini up to 32,768, Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, o3-pro up to 100,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-4.1 mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; o3-pro accepts text and images. GPT-4.1 mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-4.1 mini, Mistral Medium 3 and o3-pro are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

o3-pro is the newest, released Jun 10, 2025. Mistral Medium 3 came out May 7, 2025; GPT-4.1 mini came out Apr 14, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4.1 mini Apr 2024, Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, o3-pro May 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.