ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GLM-5V-Turbo vs DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50, GLM-5V-Turbo 49, DeepSeek OCR 2 32). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5V-Turbo

    Released Apr 1, 2026

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek OCR 2

    Released Jan 27, 2026

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.89 / $1.47
    • Context8K
  3. Google

    Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100, DeepSeek OCR 2 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek OCR 2 on price and GLM-5V-Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 · GLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGLM-5V-TurboGLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsGLM-5V-Turbo and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · DeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek OCR 2Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-5V-TurboDeepSeek OCR 2Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview
Price50%374936
Inputs & features30%802590
Context window20%32024
Overall100%49/10032/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-5V-Turbo vs DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeekGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.20$0.89 (best)$1.00
Output$4.00$1.47 (best)$5.00
Cached input$0.24——
Blended (3:1)$1.90$1.03 (best)$2.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Z.AI APIMedian of 1 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens (best)8,192 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoYesNoYes
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDglm-5v-turbo——
API providers14 (best)21
ReleasedApr 1, 2026Jan 27, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
  • DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-5V-Turbo, DeepSeek OCR 2 or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100, DeepSeek OCR 2 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek OCR 2 on price and GLM-5V-Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo, DeepSeek OCR 2 or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview?

DeepSeek OCR 2 is cheaper at $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.03 per million tokens for DeepSeek OCR 2 versus $1.90 for GLM-5V-Turbo (1.8× as much) and $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet, DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-5V-Turbo, DeepSeek OCR 2 and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072, DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video; DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video. GLM-5V-Turbo handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek OCR 2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GLM-5V-Turbo and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the newest, released Apr 14, 2026. GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026; DeepSeek OCR 2 came out Jan 27, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.