ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GLM-5-Turbo vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Seed 2.1 Pro

Seed 2.1 Pro comes out ahead, 50 to 43 and 38 on our weighted score, though MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is 8% cheaper per token.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5-Turbo

    Released Mar 16, 2026

    38/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
  2. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed

    Released Jun 8, 2026Beta

    43/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.30 / $2.61
    • Context1.05M
  3. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.1 Pro

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.891 / $4.45
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Seed 2.1 Pro is our pick

Seed 2.1 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43) and GLM-5-Turbo (38). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed $1.63 · Seed 2.1 Pro $1.78 · GLM-5-Turbo $1.90 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · Seed 2.1 Pro 256,000 · GLM-5-Turbo 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.1 ProGLM-5-Turbo: Text · MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text · Seed 2.1 Pro: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-5-TurboMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedSeed 2.1 Pro
Price50%374038
Inputs & features30%453580
Context window20%326136
Overall100%38/10043/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-5-Turbo vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Seed 2.1 Pro specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-5-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomiSeed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.20$1.30$0.891 (best)
Output$4.00$2.61 (best)$4.45
Cached input$0.24$0.011 (best)$0.178
Blended (3:1)$1.90$1.63 (best)$1.78
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial Xiaomi APIOfficial Volcengine Ark API
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)256,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYesYesYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDglm-5-turbomimo-v2.5-pro-ultraspeeddoubao-seed-2-1-pro-260628
API providers17 (best)12
ReleasedMar 16, 2026Jun 8, 2026Jun 23, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Dec 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-5-Turbo$20.00
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed$18.27
  • Seed 2.1 Pro$17.81
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-5-Turbo, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed or Seed 2.1 Pro?

Seed 2.1 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43) and GLM-5-Turbo (38). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5-Turbo, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed or Seed 2.1 Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is cheaper at $1.30 input / $2.61 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Seed 2.1 Pro costs $0.891 input / $4.45 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); GLM-5-Turbo costs $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.63 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed versus $1.78 for Seed 2.1 Pro (1.1× as much) and $1.90 for GLM-5-Turbo (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-5-Turbo has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet and Seed 2.1 Pro has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-5-Turbo, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed and Seed 2.1 Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Pro and 200,000 for GLM-5-Turbo. Maximum output per response: GLM-5-Turbo up to 131,072, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072, Seed 2.1 Pro up to 256,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-5-Turbo accepts text; MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text; Seed 2.1 Pro accepts text, images and video. Seed 2.1 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GLM-5-Turbo and Seed 2.1 Pro is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.1 Pro is the newest, released Jun 23, 2026. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed came out Jun 8, 2026; GLM-5-Turbo came out Mar 16, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed Dec 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.