ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GLM-5.3 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder comes out ahead, 68 to 63 on our weighted score, though GLM-5.3 is 3.7× cheaper per token.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5.3

    Released Aug 14, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI156.2
    • Price$1.40 / $4.40
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Muse Wonder

    Released Oct 12, 2026New

    68/100
    • ECI161.7
    • Price$4.00 / $20.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Muse Wonder is our pick

Muse Wonder is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against GLM-5.3 (63). It leads on capability and inputs & features. GLM-5.3 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMuse WonderCapabilities Index (ECI): Muse Wonder 161.7 · GLM-5.3 156.2
  • Lowest priceGLM-5.3GLM-5.3 $2.15 · Muse Wonder $8.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMuse WonderMuse Wonder 1,048,576 · GLM-5.3 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse WonderGLM-5.3: Text · Muse Wonder: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingGLM-5.3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%8491
Price25%337
Inputs & features15%45100
Context window10%6061
Overall100%63/10068/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-5.3 vs Muse Wonder specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu)Muse WonderMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.2161.7 (best)
ECI rank#33 of 165#13 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions90.9%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics68.8%82.1% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics91.1%99.4% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions41.0%—
Price per million tokens
Input$1.40 (best)$4.00
Output$4.40 (best)$20.00
Cached input$0.26$0.20 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.15 (best)$8.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial Meta API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoYes
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · high · maxYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDglm-5.3muse-wonder-1.0
API providers83 (best)9
ReleasedAug 14, 2026Oct 12, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-5.3$22.80
  • Muse Wonder$80.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-5.3 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against GLM-5.3 (63). It leads on capability and inputs & features. GLM-5.3 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3 or Muse Wonder?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Muse Wonder costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.15 per million tokens for GLM-5.3 versus $8.00 for Muse Wonder (3.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Wonder 161.7 (#13 of 165) and GLM-5.3 156.2 (#33 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (159.2–164.6 vs 154.3–158.5), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Muse Wonder 82.1%, GLM-5.3 68.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Muse Wonder 99.4%, GLM-5.3 91.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-5.3 and Muse Wonder yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Muse Wonder leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Wonder has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for GLM-5.3. Maximum output per response: GLM-5.3 up to 131,072, Muse Wonder up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-5.3 accepts text; Muse Wonder accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Muse Wonder handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

GLM-5.3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Muse Wonder is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Muse Wonder is the newest, released Oct 12, 2026. GLM-5.3 came out Aug 14, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.