ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GLM-5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra comes out ahead, 68 to 63 on our weighted score, though GLM-5.3 is 9.3× cheaper per token.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5.3

    Released Aug 14, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI156.2
    • Price$1.40 / $4.40
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-6 Astra

    Released Sep 4, 2026New

    68/100
    • ECI169.1
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

GPT-6 Astra is our pick

GPT-6 Astra is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against GLM-5.3 (63). It leads on capability and inputs & features. GLM-5.3 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-6 AstraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 169.1 · GLM-5.3 156.2
  • Lowest priceGLM-5.3GLM-5.3 $2.15 · GPT-6 Astra $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Astra 1,050,000 · GLM-5.3 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-6 AstraGLM-5.3: Text · GPT-6 Astra: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingGLM-5.3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-5.3GPT-6 Astra
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%84100
Price25%330
Inputs & features15%4580
Context window10%6061
Overall100%63/10068/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu)GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.2169.1 (best)
ECI rank#33 of 165#1 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions90.9%95.8% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics68.8%93.7% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics91.1%100% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions41.0%75.6% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.40 (best)$10.00
Output$4.40 (best)$50.00
Cached input$0.26 (best)$1.00
Blended (3:1)$2.15 (best)$20.00
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $20.00 / $75.00
Price sourceOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · high · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDglm-5.3gpt-6-astra
API providers83 (best)37
ReleasedAug 14, 2026Sep 4, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 30, 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-5.3$22.80
  • GPT-6 Astra$200.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-5.3 or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against GLM-5.3 (63). It leads on capability and inputs & features. GLM-5.3 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3 or GPT-6 Astra?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.15 per million tokens for GLM-5.3 versus $20.00 for GPT-6 Astra (9.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 169.1 (#1 of 165) and GLM-5.3 156.2 (#33 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (165.9–174.3 vs 154.3–158.5), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-6 Astra 95.8%, GLM-5.3 90.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6 Astra 93.7%, GLM-5.3 68.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6 Astra 100%, GLM-5.3 91.1%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-6 Astra 75.6%, GLM-5.3 41.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-5.3 and GPT-6 Astra yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Astra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for GLM-5.3. Maximum output per response: GLM-5.3 up to 131,072, GPT-6 Astra up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-5.3 accepts text; GPT-6 Astra accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-6 Astra handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

GLM-5.3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-6 Astra is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Astra is the newest, released Sep 4, 2026. GLM-5.3 came out Aug 14, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6 Astra Apr 30, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.