GLM-4.7-FlashX vs MiMo-V2-Pro
GLM-4.7-FlashX comes out ahead, 61 to 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.7-FlashX
61/100- ECI—
- Price$0.07 / $0.40
- Context200K
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.435 / $0.87
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GLM-4.7-FlashX is our pick
GLM-4.7-FlashX is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (54). It leads on price. MiMo-V2-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.7-FlashXGLM-4.7-FlashX $0.152 · MiMo-V2-Pro $0.544 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · GLM-4.7-FlashX 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGLM-4.7-FlashX: Text · MiMo-V2-Pro: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-4.7-FlashXPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.7-FlashX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 62 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.7-FlashXZ.ai (Zhipu) | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.07 (best) | $0.435 |
| Output | $0.40 (best) | $0.87 |
| Cached input | $0.01 | $0.0036 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.152 (best) | $0.544 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | glm-4.7-flashx | mimo-v2-pro |
| API providers | 8 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Jan 19, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Dec 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.7-FlashX$1.50
- MiMo-V2-Pro$6.09
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.7-FlashX or MiMo-V2-Pro?
GLM-4.7-FlashX is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (54). It leads on price. MiMo-V2-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-FlashX or MiMo-V2-Pro?
GLM-4.7-FlashX is cheaper at $0.07 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). MiMo-V2-Pro costs $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.152 per million tokens for GLM-4.7-FlashX versus $0.544 for MiMo-V2-Pro (3.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GLM-4.7-FlashX has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.7-FlashX and MiMo-V2-Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 200,000 for GLM-4.7-FlashX. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.7-FlashX up to 131,072, MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.7-FlashX accepts text; MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.7-FlashX publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiMo-V2-Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. GLM-4.7-FlashX came out Jan 19, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.7-FlashX Apr 2025, MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
