MiMo-V2-Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 54 on our weighted score.
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.435 / $0.87
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $1.50
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is our pick
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro $0.544 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.563 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Pro: Text · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2-Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 62 | 62 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 100 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 73/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi | Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.435 | $0.25 (best) |
| Output | $0.87 (best) | $1.50 |
| Cached input | $0.0036 (best) | $0.025 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.544 (best) | $0.563 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mimo-v2-pro | gemini-3.1-flash-lite |
| API providers | 4 | 23 (best) |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | May 7, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2-Pro$6.09
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$5.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2-Pro or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.544 per million tokens for MiMo-V2-Pro versus $0.563 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. MiMo-V2-Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the newest, released May 7, 2026. MiMo-V2-Pro came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add MiniMax-M2 HerThree-way comparison
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiniMax-M2 HerMiniMax
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3 Coder NextAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIA
