ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GLM-4.6V-Flash vs Mistral Small 4 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Small 4 65, GLM-4.6V-Flash 63, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 54). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.6V-Flash

    Released Dec 8, 2025

    63/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.161 / $0.559
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 4

    Released Mar 16, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context256K
  3. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

    Released Mar 11, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.65
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Mistral Small 4 65/100, GLM-4.6V-Flash 63/100, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.6V-Flash on price and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGLM-4.6V-FlashGLM-4.6V-Flash $0.261 · Mistral Small 4 $0.263 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · Mistral Small 4 256,000 · GLM-4.6V-Flash 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGLM-4.6V-FlashGLM-4.6V-Flash: Text, Images, Video · Mistral Small 4: Text, Images · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-4.6V-FlashMistral Small 4Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
Price50%747473
Inputs & features30%707035
Context window20%243637
Overall100%63/10065/10054/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-4.6V-Flash vs Mistral Small 4 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-4.6V-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu)Mistral Small 4Mistral AINemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.161$0.15 (best)$0.15 (best)
Output$0.559 (best)$0.60$0.65
Cached input—$0.015—
Blended (3:1)$0.261 (best)$0.263$0.275
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 16 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYesYeshighYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDglm-4.6v-flashmistral-small-2603—
API providers621 (best)18
ReleasedDec 8, 2025Mar 16, 2026Mar 11, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Jun 2025Jun 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-4.6V-Flash$2.73
  • Mistral Small 4$2.70
  • Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$2.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-4.6V-Flash, Mistral Small 4 or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Mistral Small 4 65/100, GLM-4.6V-Flash 63/100, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.6V-Flash on price and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V-Flash, Mistral Small 4 or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?

GLM-4.6V-Flash is cheaper at $0.161 input / $0.559 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers; free on Z.AI). Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.15 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.261 per million tokens for GLM-4.6V-Flash versus $0.263 for Mistral Small 4 (1× as much) and $0.275 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-4.6V-Flash has not been scored yet, Mistral Small 4 has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.6V-Flash, Mistral Small 4 and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Mistral Small 4 and 128,000 for GLM-4.6V-Flash. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.6V-Flash up to 32,768, Mistral Small 4 up to 256,000, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-4.6V-Flash accepts text, images and video; Mistral Small 4 accepts text and images; Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text. GLM-4.6V-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 4 is the newest, released Mar 16, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B came out Mar 11, 2026; GLM-4.6V-Flash came out Dec 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Small 4 Jun 2025, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Jun 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.